Write my essay -
Getting A Sample Of An Argumentative Essay On Technology
Best Resume Examples for a Variety of argumentative essay, Jobs. Do you need to write a resume? Knowing how to start can be the descriptive essay, biggest challenge and looking at argumentative, examples can be very helpful. The following samples are among the best resumes and you can use them as a starting point for essay on importance of value education, creating your own resume. They vary greatly in argumentative essay on technology, skill level, profession and format and are filled with inspiration. Take notes as you browse the examples, this will help you remember what you like and dislike and which elements you want to include when you begin writing your own. The first step to writing a great resume is to choose the application for harvard university, best type of resume for your work history, experience and the jobs you#39;re applying for. Browse these examples to get a sense of your options before choosing the right format for you. Chronological Resume - A very traditional resume format that focuses on essay on technology your work experience and lists previous jobs in order.
Functional Resume - Focus on your skills and application for harvard university expertise with a minor emphasis on essay the companies you worked for. Common Questions For 2014. Combination Resume - Combine the elements of chronological and functional resumes to highlight both your skills and previous employment. Targeted Resume - Write a resume tailored to the specific position you#39;re applying for. Mini Resume - Everyone in your job search does not need to see a full-length resume, use the example to essay, write one that#39;s brief and to the point. Nontraditional Resume - From a video to common for 2014, an online portfolio, discover how to create and argumentative use a resume that is application for harvard unique. Resume Examples with Specific Highlight Sections.
Every job seeker#39;s experience and argumentative on technology goals are different and it#39;s important to add sections to common app essay questions for 2014, your resume that highlight what makes you the best candidate. In these resumes, you will find examples of specific sections that can help you direct a hiring manager#39;s attention to what you feel is most important. Resume with Profile Statement - Give a brief and specific overview of your skills. Resume with Accomplishments Section - Highlight your career accomplishments at the top of your resume to show off your biggest achievements. Resume with a Branding Statement - Create a short, catchy statement that sells you and on technology your skills. Resume Example with Headline - Add a headline to bring attention to your value as a candidate.
Resume with Summary of Qualifications - Summarize your entire resume in a well-written paragraph that gets to the heart of your work experience and skills. Resumes for publish research, Executive and Management Positions. The following resumes are good examples for essay, individuals in management and executive positions. They can be used when applying for possible to write a dissertation in 2 weeks, other office and essay on technology business jobs as well. The highlights of these resumes are the application for harvard university, supervisory experience and business management. These are skills that employers are looking for when hiring business professionals and essay on technology it is best to for 2014, include concrete facts and examples of your achievements. Argumentative Essay On Technology. The world of business is vast and there is a great variety of positions available in possible to write in 2, it. The examples below are a sampling of great resumes used by on technology, business professionals. No matter your skill level or the position you#39;re applying for, these resumes should provide inspiration while writing your own. How To Research Papers. They include various skill sets and experience, which will help you along the way. Positions in argumentative essay on technology, the tech industry are particularly competitive and it is extremely important that your resume stands out from descriptive visit your competition.
You need to be specific about your skills, the programs you#39;re proficient with, and it#39;s good if you can give examples of end results as well. Many resumes in the technology space include a #39;Technical Skills#39; section in which you list every program, language, etc. you know. It gives your prospective employer the chance to quickly understand where your skills lie. Resumes for argumentative, Education and how to research Human Services Positions. If your career is in education or any field related to human services, your resume needs to highlight both your work experience and certifications. Be sure to include any professional licenses or affiliations you have as well.
You will notice that a number of these sample resumes feature volunteer experience. Essay. What you do outside the workplace can have an impact in landing a great job in these fields, so it#39;s worth noting any volunteer work you do. Careers in healthcare are filled with technical skills as well as patient interaction and both should be highlighted in your resume. Nurses, therapists and medical specialists should include any certifications and licenses you hold as well as details of your work experience. Volunteer experience is also a nice addition to healthcare resumes because it shows the hiring manager that you have compassion off the job as well.
If possible, include how you went above the research papers, call of duty or add any significant career achievements. Every trade position has a specific set of skills that are required on the job and it is important that you highlight your technical training in argumentative, your resume. Include any certifications, licenses, affiliations and essays achievements that are relevant or necessary to your field. Notice how the example resumes are very specific when it comes to technical skills. Many also include supervisory and management experience as well as the adherence to codes and the ability to troubleshoot technical problems. Resumes for Writers, Creatives, and Freelancers. Freelancers, writers, and other professionals in creative fields may have the most difficult time writing a resume. Argumentative. Your jobs may be varied, your experience and descriptive essay place skills vast, and argumentative it can be difficult getting it all on paper. There are many ways to approach these types of resumes and the examples should help you find a direction that#39;s right for you. You are a creative, so you need to put some of that ingenuity into writing the most effective resume you can. You might also consider developing a curriculum vitae (CV) and have that available as well.
Resumes for Customer Service Jobs. Customer service is a key element in many jobs and on importance of value it is important that you focus on that in your resume. Whether you are applying at a restaurant, a hair salon or a local store, the argumentative, hiring manager will want to know that you will put their customers first. Some of these resume examples also include specific skills required for the position. For instance, a chef may choose to highlight the presentation and speed involved in education in school, serving meals to customers. A stylist will want to argumentative essay, focus on special treatments they have learned and a retail associate may want to show off their merchandising expertise. Also, be sure to include any special honors or achievements you have received. Were you the employee of the month? Did you reach a high sales goal? Teenagers and recent college graduates may need to write a resume as well and this can be tricky because of your limited work history.
You will need to supplement your resume with other achievements. Include volunteer work and accomplishments at school in university, your resume and use these examples to learn how to feature them. Employers understand that you are young and looking to add to your experience, so give them as much as you can that shows you#39;ll be a valuable employee.
Buy Essays Online from Successful Essay -
An argumentative essay on technology world - Essay Forum
Harvard PhD Theses in Physics: 2000 to Present. A.M. degree is listed after undergraduate degree. Before 2008, If no Harvard A.M. Argumentative On Technology! was awarded, only undergraduate degree is listed. Thesis advisor follows title. ARNOLD, CRAIG BRIAN, B.S. (Haverford) 1994, (Harvard) 1996. Solute Redistribution in essays, Far from Equilibrium Liquid and Vapor Phase Growth. (Aziz) BARNETT, ALEXANDER HARVEY, B.A. (Cambridge) 1994. 2.57MB; full size:
BEAR, DAVID CHAIYARAT. A.B. (Harvard) 1992. Essay! (Harvard) 1995. Fundamental Symmetry Tests Using a 129Xe/3He Dual Noble Gas Maser. (Papaliolios/Walsworth) BETTERTON, MEREDITH DIANE, A.B. (Princeton) 1994, (Harvard) 1996. Things Fall Apart: Topics in essay education, Biophysics and Pattern Formation. (Fisher) BIES, WILLIAM EDWARD, A.B. (Princeton) 1990. (Harvard) 1993.
1.87 MB; full size: BROME, CLINTON REED, A.B. (Harvard) 1993, (Harvard) 1997. Magnetic Trapping of argumentative on technology Ultracold Neutrons. Essay Place! (Doyle) BUSCH, BRIAN DAVID, B.S. (Cornell) 1990, (Harvard) 1997. Bose Einstein Condensation and Atomic Interations in a Sodium Gas. (Golovchenko)
CALLAN, JOHN PAUL, B.A. (Trinity) 1993, (Harvard) 1997. Ultrafast Dynamics and Phase Changes in Solids Excited by Femtosecond Laser Pulses. (Mazur) DANIELS, DAVID CLARK, B.S. (Wheaton) 1993, (Harvard) 1996. A Search for nm ® nt Neutrino Oscillations in the t ® r Decay Channel Using the NOMAD Detector. (Feldman) DAW, ADRIAN NIGEL, B.S.(Yale) 1989, (Harvard) 1994.
DEKKER, NYNKE HESTER, B.S. (Yale) 1993, (Harvard) 1996. Guiding Atoms on a Chip. (Prentiss) DRNDIC, MARIJA, B.A. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Harvard) 1994, (Harvard) 1998. Micro-Electromagnets for Particle Control. (Westervelt) DUNCAN, DAVID SCOTT, B.A. How To Publish Research! (Duke) 1992, (Harvard) 1997. Mesoscopic Electron Transpirt in Semiconductor Nanostructures. Argumentative On Technology! (Westervelt) GOLDMAN, MARK STEVEN, B.S. (Stanford) 1993. (Harvard) 1996.
Computational Implications of Activity-Dependent Neuronal Processes. (Abbott [Brandeis]/ Marcus) HUNT, ALAN WOLFE, B.S. Questions For 2014! (Michigan) 1994. Annihilation of Fast Channeled Positrons. (Golovchenko) KAISER, DAVID ISAAC, B.A. (Dartmouth) 1992, (Harvard) 1997. Post-Inflation Reheating in essay, an Expanding Universe. (Guth [MIT]/Galison) SMITH, GREGORY SAMUEL, B.A. (Amherst) 1993. Multiscale Simulations of Indentation. (Kaxiras)
SPIROPULU, MARIA, B.S. (Aristotle) 1993. (Harvard) 1995. A Blind Search for Supersymmetry in Proton-Antiproton Collisions at sqrt (s) = 1.8 Tev Using the Missing Energy Plus Multijet. (Huth) ZHUKOV, VYACHESLAV V., B.A., M.S. (Moscow Insti. Phy. Tech.) 1991, (Harvard) 1995. String Theory in Anti-deSitter Spaces and Black Holes in Five Dimensions. (Bershadsky) BAILEY, STEPHEN JOHN, B.S. (Washington) 1995. A Study of B > J/y K (*)0 X Decays. On Importance Of Value! (Huth) CHEN, LESTER HAO-LIN, B.S. On Technology! (Duke) 1995. (Harvard) 1999. Charge-Iimaging Field-Effect Transistors for Scanned Probe Microscopy. (Westervelt)
CHOU, YI, B.S. (National Tsing Hua University) 1988. (National Tsing Hua University) 1990. Developments of EXITE2 and Timing Analysis of Ultra-Compact X-ray Binaries. (Papaliolios/Grindlay) ERSHOV, ALEXEY, B.S. (Moscow Institute of Physics Technology) 1996. Beauty Meson Decays to Charmonium. (Feldman) FOX, DAVID CHARLES, A.B. (Princeton) 1991. On Confidence! (Harvard) 1994. The Structure of Clusters of Galaxies. (Loeb) FUKUTO, MASAFUMI, B.S. (Oregon) 1994. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Harvard) 1997).
Two-Dimensional Structures and Order of Nano-Objects on the Surface of Water: Synchrotron X-ray Scattering Studies. Application Essays University! (Pershan) HILL, MARC, B.S. (Illinois) 1994. Experimental Studies of W-band Accelerator Structures at High Field. (Huth) KANNAPPAN, SHEILA, A.B. (Harvard) 1991. (Harvard, History of Science) 2001. Kinematic Clues to essay, the Formation and Evolution of Galaxies. (Horowitz) LAU, CHUN-NING, B.A. (Chicago) 1994. (Harvard) 1997. Quantum Phase Slips in Superconducting Nanowires. (Tinkham) OSWALD, JOSEPH ANTON, B.S. (Duke) 1992. (Harvard) 1995. Metallo-dielectric Photonic Crystal Filters for Infrared Applications. (Verghese/Tinkham)
SCHAFFER, CHRISTOPHER BRIAN, B.S. (Florida) 1995. Interaction of Femtosecond Laser Pulses with Transparent Materials. (Mazur) SPRADLIN, MARCUS BENJAMIN, B.A. (Princeton) 1996. (Harvard) 1999. AdS 2 Black Holes and Soliton Moduli Spaces. (Strominger) WU, CLAUDIA, Diplom (Hannover) 1991. (Harvard) 1995. Femtosecond Laser-Gas-Solid Interactions. (Mazur)
BOZOVIC, DOLORES, B.S. ( Stanford University ) 1995. (Harvard) 1997. Defect Formation and Electron Transport in Carbon Nanotubes. (Tinkham) BRITTO-PACUMIO, RUTH ALEXANDRA, B.S. (MIT) 1996. (Harvard) 1998. Bound States of Supersymmetric Black Holes. (Strominger) CACHAZO, FREDDY ALEXANDER, B.S. (Simon Bolivar University) 1996.
Dualities in Field Theory from Geometric Transitions in String Theory. (Vafa) CHOU, YI, B.S. ( National Tsing Hua University ) 1988. ( National Tsing Hua University ) 1990. Developments of EXITE2 and Timing Analysis of application essays for harvard university Ultra-Compact X-ray Binaries. (Papaliolios/Grindlay) COLDWELL, CHARLES MICHAEL, A.B. (Harvard) 1992. A Search for Interstellar Communications at Optical Wavelengths. (Horowitz) DUTTON, ZACHARY JOHN, B.A. (University of California Berkeley) 1996. Argumentative On Technology! (Harvard) 2002. FOX, DAVID CHARLES, A.B. ( Princeton ) 1991. (Harvard) 1994.
The Structure of Clusters of Galaxies. (Shapiro) GOEL, ANITA, B.S. (Stanford) 1995. Single Molecule Dynamics of Motor Enzymes Along DNA. (Herschbach/ Wilson) HALL, CARTER, B.S. (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ.) 1996. Measurement of the descriptive visit isolated direct photon cross section with conversions in proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt (s) = 1.8 TeV. (Franklin) JANZEN, PAUL HENRY, B. Sc., (University of Windsor) 1992. (Harvard) 1994.
An Experiment to argumentative, Measure Electron Impact Excitation of Ions that have Metastable States. (Horowitz/Kohl) KIM, Daniel Young-Joon, AB/AM (Harvard) 1995. Properties of Inclusive B > psi Production. (Wilson/Brandenburg) LANDHUIS, DAVID PAUL, B.S. (Stanford) 1994. (Harvard) 1997. Studies with Ultracold Metastable Hydrogen. University! (Gabrielse/Kleppner) LAU, CHUN-NING, B.A. ( Chicago ) 1994. Essay! (Harvard) 1997. Quantum Phase Slips in Superconducting Nanowires . (Tinkham) LEE, CHUNGSOK, B.A. ( University of how to publish research California , Berkeley ) 1995. ( Harvard University ) 2002. Control and Manipulation of argumentative Magnetic Nanoparticles and Cold Atoms Using Micro-electromagnets. How To Papers! (Westervelt) LUBENSKY, DAVID KOSLAN, A.B. ( Princeton University ) 1994. (Harvard) 1997. Theoretical Studies of Polynucleotide Biophysics. (Nelson)
MATTONI, CARLO EGON HEINRICH, A.B. ( Harvard College ) 1995. (Harvard University ) 1998. Magnetic Trapping of Ultracold Neutrons Produced Using a Monochromatic Cold Neutron Beam. (Doyle) MCKINSEY, DANIEL NICHOLAS, B.S. (University of Michigan) 1995. (Harvard) 1998. Detecting Magnetically Trapped Neutrons: Liquid Helium As a Scintillator. Argumentative On Technology! (Doyle) OZEL, FERYAL, B.S. (Columbia University) 1996. The Effects of Strong Magnetic and Gravitational Fields on is it possible weeks Emission Properties of Neutron Stars. (Narayan) PAUTOT, SOPHIE, B.S. (University of Bordeaux I and II) 1995. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (University of Bordeaux I and II) 1996. Lipids behavior at dodecane-water interface. (Weitz) PRASAD, VIKRAM, B. Tech. (Indian Institute of Technology) 1996. ( University of Pennsylvania ) 1999.
Weakly interacting colloid-polymer mixtures. (Weitz) SALWEN, NATHAN KALMAN, A.B. (Harvard) 1994. Non-perturbative Methods in Modal Field Theory. (Coleman) SCHWARZ, JENNIFER MARIE, B.S., B.A. (University of Maryland) 1994. Depinning with Elastic Waves: Criticality, Hysteresis, and Even Pseudo-Hysteresis. (Fisher) SHAW, SCOT ELMER JAMES, B.A. (Lawrence University) 1998. SQUIRES, TODD MICHAEL, B.S. (UCLA) 1995. Hydrodynamics and descriptive place visit Electrokinetics in Colloidal and Microfluidic Systems. (Fisher/Brenner)
VOLOVICH, ANASTASIA, A.M. (Moscow State) 1998. Holography for Coset Spaces and Noncommutative Solitions. (Strominger) WEINSTEIN, JONATHAN DAVID, B.S. (Caltech) 1995. Argumentative Essay! (Harvard) 1998. Magnetic Trapping of on confidence Atomic Chromium and Molecular Calcium Monohydride. (Doyle) WONG, GLENN PATRICK, B.S. (Stanford) 1993. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Harvard) 1995. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments Using Laser-Polarized Noble Gas . (Shapiro) YESLEY, PETER SPOOR, B.S. (MIT) 1995. The Road to Antihydrogen. (Gabrielse) *YOUNKIN, REBECCA JANE, A.B. ( Mt. Holyoke ) 1993. Possible! (Harvard) 1996. Surface Studies and Microstructure Fabrication Using Femtosecond. (Mazur)
ASHCOM, JONATHAN BENJAMIN, B.S. (Brown University) 1996. (Harvard) 2000. The role of focusing in the interaction of femtosecond laser pulses with transparent materials. (Mazur) CHAN, IAN HIN-YUN , B.S. Argumentative Essay On Technology! ( Sanford University ) 1994. CREMERS, JACOB NICO HENDRIK JAN, B.S. (MIT) 1994. Descriptive Visit! (Harvard) 2002. Pumping and on technology Spin-Orbit Coupling in Quantum Dots. (Halperin) deCARVALHO, ROBERT, B.S. Essays! (University of Arizona) 1996. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Harvard) 1999. Inelastic Scattering of Magnetically Trapped Atomic Chromium. (Doyle) D’URSO, BRIAN RICHARD, B.S. (California Institute of Technology) 1998. Cooling and Self-Excitation of a One-Electron Oscillator. Essays! (Gabrielse) FIETE, GREGORY ALAN, B.S. (Purdue University) 1997. (Harvard) 1999. Theory of Kondo Effect in Nanoscale Systems and argumentative essay on technology Studies of III-V Diluated Magnetic Semiconductors. (Heller)
GABEL, CHRISTOPHER VAUGHN, A.B. (Princeton University) 1996. The speed of the flagellar rotary motor of essay in school Escherichia coli varies linearly with protonmotive force. (Berg) GORDON, VERNITA DIANE, B.S. (Vanderbilt University) 1996. (Harvard) 2001. HAILU, GIRMA, B.S. Essay! (Addis Ababa University). (Addis Ababa University) 1992. (Harvard) 1999. Chiral orbifold Construction of Field Theories with Extra Dimensions. (Georgi) HEADRICK, MATTHEW PETER, B.A. (Princeton University) 1994. (Harvard) 1998. Noncummutative Solitons and Closed String Tachyons. Possible To Write In 2! (Minwalla)
HUMPHREY, MARC ANDREW, B.S. (Western Michigan University). Essay! 1997 (Harvard) 2000. LEPORE, NATASHA, B.S. On Importance Of Value Education In School! (University of Montreal) LEROY, BRIAN JAMES, LOPATNIKOVA, ANNA, B.S. (MIT) 1997. Spontaneously symmetry-broken states in the quantum Hall regime. Argumentative On Technology! (Halperin/Wen)
MADRAK, ROBYN LEIGH, B.A. (Cornell University) 1995. MALONEY, ALEXANDER DEWITT, MAOZ, LIAT, B.S. (Hebrew University) 1995. 7.16 MB] (Maldacena/ Strominger) MARINELLI, LUCA, Laurea ( University of Genova ) 1995. ( Harvard University ) 1997. Analysis of essays for harvard university quasiparticles in the mixed state of a d-wave superconductor and NMR in pores with surface relaxation. (Halperin) REFAEL, GIL, B.S. (Tel Aviv University) 1997. (Harvard) 2001. Randomness, Dissipation, and Quantum Fluctuations in Spin Chains and Mesoscopic Superconductor Arrays. (Fisher/Demler) SHEN, NAN, B.A. (Rhode Island College) 1996.
Photodisruption in biological tissues using femtosecond laser pulses . (Mazur) TSERKOVNYAK, YAROSLAV, (University of British Columbia) 1999. Argumentative Essay! (Harvard) 2001. VALENTINE, MEGAN THERESA, B.S. Essay Of Value Education! (Leigh University) 1997. Argumentative Essay! (University of essay on importance of value Pennsylvania) 1999. VANICEK, JIRI JOSEPH LADISLAV, A.B. (Harvard College). (Harvard) 2000. WIJNHOLT, MARTIJN PAUL, B.S. (University of argumentative on technology Warwick) 1996. Investigations in the physics of solitons in string theory. (Vafa) ZABOW, GARY, B.S. (University of Cape Town) 1994. Charged-particle optics for application for harvard university neutral particles. (Prentiss) ZIELINSKI, LUKASZ JOZEF, B.S. (Stanford University) 1997.
Restriction and inhomogeneous magnetic fields in the nuclear magnetic resonance study of diffusion. (Halperin/Sen) ABRAHAM, MATHEW CHEERAN, B.S. (Haverford College) 1997 (Harvard University) 2000. Hot Electron Transpoort and Current Sensing. (Westervelt) BOWDEN, NATHANIEL SEAN, B.S., M.S. (University of Auckland) 1996. Production of Cold Antihydrogen During the Positron Cooling of Antiprotons. (Gabrielse) CHANG, SPENCER, B.S. (Stanford University) 1999. (Harvard) 2001.
DZHOSYUK, SERGEI N., B.S.(Moscow Institute of essay on technology Physics and Technology)1995.(Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology)1997. M agnetic trapping of common for 2014 neutrons for measurement of the neutron lifetime. (Doyle) EGOROV, DMITRO MIKHAILOVICH, B.S. (Moscow Institute of essay on technology Physics and. FIETE, ILA RANI, B.S. (University of Michigan) 1997. (Harvard University) 2000. GARDEL, MARGARET LISE, B.A. (Brown University) 1998. (Harvard University) 2003. Elasticity of F-actin Networks. Essay In School! (Weitz) HSU, MING F., A.B. ( Princeton University) 1999.
Charged Colloidal Particles in Non-polar Solvents and Self-assembled Colloidal Model Systems . Argumentative Essay! (Weitz) KING, GAVIN MCLEAN, B.S. (Bates College) 1997 (Dartmouth college) 2001. Probing the Longitudinal Resolution of a Solid State nanopore Microscope with Nanotubes. (Golovchenko) MANLEY, SULIANA, B.A.(Rice University) 1997. Questions For 2014! (Harvard University) 2001. Mechanical stability of fractal colloid gels. (Weitz) MICHNIAK,JR.,ROBERT ALLEN, B.S. (University of on technology Michigan) 1997. App Essay Questions! (Harvard University) 2001. Enhanced Buffer Gas Loading: Cooling and Trapping of Atoms with Low Effective Magnetic Moments. (Doyle) MODY, AREEZ MINOO, B.S. (Caltech) 1994. Thermodynamics of ultracold singly charged particles. (Heller)
ODOM, BRIAN CARL, B.S. (Stanford University) 1995. (Harvard University) 1999. Measurement of the Electron g-Factor in a Sub-Kelvin Cylindrical Cavity . (Gabrielse) OXLEY, PAUL KEVIN, B.A. On Technology! (Oxford University) 1994. ROESER, CHRISTOPHER ALLAN DEWALD, B.A. (University of Chicago) 1998. Ultrafast Dynamics and is it weeks Optical Control of Coherent Phonons in Tellurium. (Mazur) SHPYRKO, OLEG GRIGORY, B.S. (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology) 1995. Experimental X-Ray Studies of Liquid Surfaces. (Pershan) SON, JOHN SANG WON, B.A. (Columbia University) 1996. ZELEVINSKY, TANYA, S.B. (MIT) 1999. (Harvard University) 2001.
Helium 2^3 P Fine Structure Measurement in essay on technology, a Discharge Cell. (Gabrielse) ZUMBUHL, DOMINIK MAX, Diploma, M.S. Application Essays For Harvard! (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology), 1998. ANDRE, AXEL PHILIPPE, M.S. (Imperial College) 1997. (HarvardUniversity) 1999. Nonclassical States of essay on technology Light and Atomic Ensembles: Generation and New Applications. A Dissertation Weeks! (Lukin) BIERCUK, MICHAEL JORDAN, Local Gate Control in Carbon Nanotube Quantum Devices. (Marcus) CHEN, HAOYU HENRY, (University Maryland) 1998. (Harvard University) 2000. CONRAD, JACINTA CARMEL, S.B. (University of Chicago) 1999. ( Harvard University) 2002. Mechanical Response and Dynamic Arrest in Colloidal Glasses and Gels. (Weitz)
DASGUPTA, BIVASH R., B.S.C. (Presidency College) 1995. (Indian Institute of Technology) 1997. Microrheology and Dynamic Light Scattering Studies of Polymer Solutions. (Weitz) HANCOX, CINDY IRENE, B.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 1997. ( Harvard University) 2002. Magnetic trapping of transition-metal and rare-earth atoms using buffer-gas loading. (Doyle) HOUCK, ANDREW A., B.S.E. (Princeton University) 2000. Novel Techniques Towards Nuclear Spin Detection. (Marcus/Chuang) LEE, HAK-HO, B.S. (Seoul National University) 1998. Microelectronic/Microfluidic Hybrid System for argumentative on technology the Manipulation of in 2 weeks Biological Cells. (Westervelt).
NEITZKE, ANDREW M., A.B. (Princeton University) 1998. Toward a Nonperturbative Topological String. (Vafa) PODOLSKY, DANIEL, B.S. ( Stanford University) 1998. (Harvard University) 2000. Interplay of Magnetism and Superconductivity in Strongly Correlated Electron Systems. (Demler) RAPPOCCIO, SALVATORE ROCCO, B.A. (Boston University ) 2000.
Measurement of the ttbar Production Cross Section in ppbar Collisions at sqrt (s) = 1.96 TeV. (Foland) SPECK, ANDREW J., (Williams College) 2000. (Harvard) 2002. 9.2 MB] (Gabrielse) TEE, SHANG YOU, B.S. ( Columbia University) 1995. (Stevens Institute of Technology) 1997. Velocity Fluctuations in essay on technology, Sedimentation and Fluidized Beds. (Weitz) THOMPSON, DAVID MATTOON, (Yale) 1999 B.S./M.S.
440 KB] (Strominger) ZHU, CHENG, B.S. ( Tsinghua University) 1996. (Chinese Science and Technology University) 1997. Gas phase atomic and molecular process . (Lukin/Dalgarno) BABICH, DANIEL MICHAEL, A.B. ( Princeton University) 2002. To Write Weeks! ( Harvard University) 2005. Cosmological Non-Gaussianity and on technology Reionization . (Loeb) BARNETT, RYAN LEE, B.S. ( Ohio State University) 2000. ( Harvard University) 2002. Studies of Strongly correlated Systems: From First Principles Computations to Effective Hamiltonians and common Novel Quantum Phases. (Demler) BOWLES, ANITA MARIE, B.S. ( University of Colorado) 1996. ( Harvard University) 1998. Stress Evolution in Thin Films of a Polymer . (Weitz/Spaepen) CHIJIOKE, AKOBUIJE DOUGLAS EZIANI, B.S.E. ( Duke University) 1996. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 1998.
CYRIER, MICHELLE CHRISTINE, B.S. ( University of essay California , Berkeley) 2000. Physics From Geometry: Non-Kahler Compactifications, Black Rings and dS/CFT. Common App Essay Questions! (Strominger) DESAI, MICHAEL MANISH, B.A. ( Princeton University ) 1999. ( University of Cambridge ) 2000. Evolution in Large Asexual Populations. (Murray/Fisher) EISAMAN, MATTHEW D, A.B. (Princeton) 2000. (Harvard University) 2004.
HOLLOWAY, AYANA TAMU, A.B. ( Princeton University) 1998. The First Direct Limit on the t Quark Lifetime. ( Franklin) HOWARD, ANDREW WILLIAM, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of argumentative essay Technology) 1998. (Harvard University) 2001. Astronomical Searches for Nanosecond Optical Pulses. (Horowitz) HUANG, JIAN, BS (Jilin University, P.R.China)1998.
JONES, GREGORY CHAPMAN, B.S. (University of Missouri, Columbia) 2001. KILIC, CAN, B.S. ( Bogazici University) 2000. Naturalness of Unknown Physics: Theoretical Models and Experimental Signatures. (Arkani-Hamed) LAKADAMYALI, MELIKE, B.S. ( University of Texas , Austin ) 2001. Real-Time Imaging of Viral Infection and Intracellular Transport in Live Cells. (Zhuang) MAHBUBANI, RAKHI, MSci (University of Bristol) 2000.
1.5 MB] (Arkani-Hamed) MARSANO, JOSEPH DANIEL, B.S. (University of Michigan) 2001. (Harvard University) 2004. The Phase Structure of Yang-Mills Theories and their Gravity Duals. (Minwalla) NGUYEN, SCOTT VINH, B.S. (University of Texan, Austin) 2000. Buffer gas loading and evaporative cooling in the multi-partial-wave regeime. (Doyle) PAPADODIMAS, KYRIAKOS, B.A. ( University of Athens ) 2000. Phase Transitions in Large N Gauge Theories and String Theory Duals. Essays! (Minwalla)
PARROTT, ROBERT ELLIS, B.A. (Dartmouth College) 1997. Argumentative! (Dartmouth College) 1999. Topics in Electron Dynamics in essays on confidence, Moderate Magnetic Fields . (Heller) POTOK, RONALD MICHAEL, B.S. ( University of Texas Austin) 2000. Probing Many Body Effects in Semiconductor Nanostructures. (Goldhaber-Gordon/Marcus) RUST, MICHAEL JOSEPH, B.S. Argumentative Essay On Technology! ( Harvey Mudd College ). Fluorescence Techniques for Single Virus Particle Tracking and Sub-Diffraction Limit Imaging. (Zhuang) SAGE, JENNIFER NICOLE FUES, B.A. Essay Visit! ( Washington University ) 1997. Argumentative Essay On Technology! ( Harvard University ) 2000. Measurements of Lateral Boron Diffusion in Silicon and Stress Effects on Epitaxial Growth . (Aziz/Kaxiras) TAYLOR, JACOB MASON, A.B. ( Harvard College ) 2000.
Hyperfine Interactions and Quantum Information Processing in Quantum Dots. Papers! (Lukin) THALER, JESSE KEMPNER, S.B. (Brown University). ( Harvard University) 2004. Symmetry Breaking at essay, the Energy Frontier . (Arkani-Hamed) THAMBYAHPILLAI, SHIYAMALA NAYAGI, M.S. Common App Essay Questions! (Imperial College) 1999. Brane Worlds and Deconstruction. (Randall)
VAISHNAV, JAY Y., B.S. (University of Maryland) 2000. ( Harvard University) 2002. VITELLI, VINCENZO, B.S. (Imperial College) 2000. Crystals , Liquid Crystals and Superfluid Helium on Curved Surfaces. (Nelson) WALKER, DEVIN GEORGE EDWARD, B.S. (Hampton University) 1998. ( Harvard University ) 2001. Theories on the Origin of Mass and Dark Matter. (Arkani-Hamed/Georgi) WHITE, OLIVIA LAWRENCE, B.S. ( Stanford University ) 1997.
Towards Real Spin Glasses: Ground States and on technology Dynamics. On Importance Of Value In School! (Fisher) YIN, XI, B.S. (University of Science and Technology of China) 2001. Black Holes, Anti de Sitter Space, and Topological Strings. (Strominger) YANG, LIANG, B.S. (Yale University) 1999. ( Harvard University) 2002. Towards Precision Measurement of the Neutron Lifetime using Magnetically Trapped Neutrons. (Doyle) YAVIN, ITAY, B. Sc. (York University, Ontario) 2002. 662 KB] (Arkani-Hamed) CHILDRESS, LILIAN ISABEL, B.A. (Harvard College) 2001. Coherent manipulation of single quantum systems in the solid state . (Lukin) CLARK, DAMON ALISTAIR.
Biophysical Analysis of essay on technology Thermostatic Behavior in essay of value, C. elegans . (Samuel) ERNEBJERG, MORTEN, MPhys (University of Oxford) 2002. FARKAS, DANIEL MARTIN, B.S. (Yale University) 2000. An Optical Reference and Frequency Comb for Improved Spectroscopy of on technology Helium . App Essay Questions For 2014! (Gabrielse) GINSBERG, NAOMI SHAUNA, B.A. (University of Toronto) 2000. Argumentative! (Harvard University) 2002. Manipulations with spatially compressed slow light pulses in Bose-Einstein condensates. (Hau) HOFFMAN, LAUREN K., B.S. (California Institute of Technology) 2002.
Orbital Dynamics in Galaxy Mergers . (Loeb) HUANG, LISA LI FANG, B.S. (UCLA) 1999. Black Hole Attractors and Gauge Theories . (Strominger) HUNT, THOMAS PETER, B.S. Essay Place! (Stanford University) 2000. Integrated Circuit / Microfluidic Chips for Dielectric Manipulation . (Westervelt) IMAMBEKOV, ADILET, B.S. Argumentative Essay! (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology) 2002. JAFFERIS, DANIEL LOUIS, B.S. (Yale) 2001. JENKS, ROBERT A., B.A. (Williams College) 1998. LEBEDEV, ANDRE, B.S. Essays On Confidence! (University of Virginia) 1999.
Ratio of Pion Kaon Production in Proton Carbon Interactions . (Feldman) LIU, JIAYU, B.S. (Nanjing University of China) 2002. (Harvard) 2004. Microscopic origin of the elasticity of F-actin networks . (Weitz) MATHEY, LUDWIG GUENTER, Vordiplom (University of argumentative Heidelberg) 1998. Quantum phases of low-dimensional ultra-cold atom systems. Essay On Importance Education! (Castro-Neto/Halperin) MAXWELL, STEPHEN EDWARD.
Buffer Gas Cooled Atoms and Molecules: Production, Collisional Studies, and on technology Applications. (Doyle) MO, YINA, B.S. On Confidence! (University of Science and essay on technology Technology China) 2002. Theoretical Studies of Growth Processes and Electronic Properties of Nanostructures on Surfaces. (Kaxiras) PARUCHURI, SRINIVAS S., B. S. (Cornell) 2000. (Harvard University) 2002. Deformations of Free Jets . Is It Possible To Write A Dissertation In 2 Weeks! (Brenner//Weitz) Localization in a Finite Inhomogeneous Quantum Wire and Diffusion through Random Spheres with Partially Absorbing Surfaces. (Halperin) RITTER, WILLIAM GORDON, B.A. (University of Chicago) 1999. Euclidean Quantum Field Theory: Curved Spacetimes and Gauge Fields. (Jaffe) SARAIKIN, KIRILL ANATOLYEVICH, B.S. (Moscow Institute for Physics and Technology) 1999. SCHULZ, ALEXIA EIRINN, B.A. Essay On Technology! (Boston University ) 1998. (Harvard University) 2000.
Astrophysical Probes of Dark Energy. (White/Huth) SCHUSTER, PHILIP CHRISTIAN, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2003. ( Harvard University ) 2006. Uncovering the New Standard Model at how to publish research papers, the LHC . (Arkani-Hamed) SEUN, SIN MAN, B.A. (Smith College) 2000. B.E. (Dartmouth College) 2000. Measurement of p-K Ratios from the NuMI Target . (Feldman) SHERMAN, DANIEL JOSEPH, B.A. (University of argumentative essay on technology Pennsylvania ) 2001.
Measurement of the Top Quark Pair Production Cross Section with 1.12 fb -1 of app essay questions pp Collisions at sqrt (s) = 1.96 TeV. ( Franklin ) SIMONS, AARON, B.S. (California Institute of argumentative Technology) 2002. Black Hole Superconformal Quantum Mechanics. (Strominger) SLOWE, CHRISTOPHER BRIAN, AB/AM (Harvard University). Experiments and descriptive Simulations in Cooling and Trapping of a High Flux Rubidium Beam. (Hau) STRIEHL, PIERRE SEBASTIAN, Diploma (University of essay Heidelberg) 2004.
A high-flux cold-atom source for area-enclosing atom interferometry. (Prentiss) TORO, NATALIA, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2003. Fundamental Physics at the Threshold of common app essay questions for 2014 Discovery . (Arkani-Hamed) WISSNER-GROSS, ALEXANDER DAVID, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2003. (Harvard University ) 2004. Physically Programmable Surfaces. (Kaxiras) WONG, WESLEY PHILIP, B.S. (University of British Columbia) 1999. ZAW, INGYIN, B.A. (Harvard College) 2001. (Harvard University) 2003. Search for the Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t > qZ in pp Collisions at vs = 1.96 TeV. (Franklin) BRAHMS, NATHANIEL CHARLES, Sc.B. (Brown University) 2001.
BURBANK, KENDRA S., B.A. Essay! (Bryn Mawr College) 2000. (Harvard University) 2004. Self-organization mechanisms in the assembly and maintenance of bipolar spindles. (Fisher/Mitchison) CAMPBELL, WESLEY C., B.S. (Trinity University) 2001. CHAISANGUANTHUM, KRIS SOMBOON, B.S. (Harvard University ) 2001. CHANG, DARRICK, B.S. (Stanford University) 2001. Controlling atom-photon interactions in nano-structured media. (Lukin) CHOU, JOHN PAUL, A.B. (Princeton University) 2002. (Harvard University) 2006. Production Cross Section Measurement using Soft Electron Tagging in is it possible a dissertation in 2 weeks, pp Collisions at argumentative essay on technology, vs = 1.96 TeV . (Franklin) DEL MAESTRO, ADRIAN GIUSEPPE, B.S. Is It Weeks! (University of Waterloo) 2002, (University of. DI CARLO, LEONARDO, B.S. (Stanford University) 1999. (Stanford University) 2000. Mesocopic Electronics Beyond DC Transport . (Marcus)
DUNKEL, EMILY REBECCA, B.S. (University of California Los Angeles) 2001. FINKLER, ILYA GRIGORYEVICH, B.S. (Ohio State University) 2001. Nonlinear Phenomena in argumentative essay on technology, Two-Dimensional and Quasi-Two-Dimensional Electron Systems. Essays! (Halperin) FITZPATRICK, ANDREW LIAM, B.S. (University of essay on technology Chicago) 2004. (Harvard University) 2005. Broken Symmetries and Signatures . (Randall) GARG, ARTI, A.B., B.S. (Stanford University) 2000. (Stanford University) 2001. (University of Washington) 2002. Microlensing Candidate Selection and Detection Efficiency for the Super MACHO Dark Matter Search . (Stubbs) GERSHOW, MARC HERMAN, B.S. (Stanford University) 2001. Trapping Single Molecules with a Solid State Nanopore . (Golovchenko) GRANT, LARS, B.S. (McGill University) 2001. Aspects of Quantization in descriptive visit, AdS/CFT . Essay! (Vafa/Minwalla)
GUICA, MONICA MARIA, B.A. (University of Chicago) 2003. Supersymmetric Attractors, Topological Strings, and the M5-Brane CFT . (Strominger) HANNEKE, DAVID ANDREW, B.S. (Case Western) 2001. (Harvard University) 2003. HATCH, KRISTI RENEE, B.S. (Brigham Young University) 2004. Probing the common app essay questions mechanical stability of DNA by unzipping and rezipping the DNA at constant force. (Prentiss) HOHLFELD, EVAN BENJAMIN, B.S. (Stanford University) 2001. Creasing, Point-bifurcations, and the Spontaneous Breakdown of Scale-invariance . (Weitz/Mahadevan) KATIFORI, ELENI, Ptichion (University of essay on technology Athens) 2002. (Harvard University) 2004. Vortices, rings and pollen grains: Elasticity and statistical physics in soft matter . (Nelson) LAPAN, JOSHUA MICHAEL, B.S. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2002. (Harvard University) 2006.
LE SAGE, DAVID ANTHONY, B.S. (University of California Berkeley) 2002. First Antihydrogen Production within a Combined Penning-Ioffe Trap . (Gabrielse) LI, WEI, B.S. (Peking University) 1999. (Peking University) 2002. Gauge/Gravity Correspondence and Black Hole Attractors in Various Dimensions . (Strominger) LU, PETER JAMES, B.A. (Princeton University) 2000. (Harvard University) 2002. Gelation and Phase Separation of Attractive Colloids . (Weitz) MUNDAY, JEREMY NATHAN, B.S. Application For Harvard! (Middle Tennessee State University) 2003. (Harvard University) 2005. Attractive, repulsive, and argumentative essay on technology rotational QED forces: experiments and calculations . (Hau/Capasso) RAJU, SUVRAT, B.S. (St. Stephen’s College) 2002. (Harvard University) 2003.
Supersymmetric Partition Functions in the AdS/CFT Conjecture . RISTROPH, TRYGVE GIBBENS, B.S. (University of Texas at Austin) 1999. Capture and Ionization Detection of Laser-Cooled Rubidium Atoms with a Charged Suspended Carbon Nanotube . (Hau) SVACHA, GEOFFRY THOMAS, B.S. (University of Michigan) 2002. Nanoscale nonlinear optics using silica nanowires . (Mazur) TURNER, ARI M., B.A. (Princeton University) 2000. Vortices Vacate Vales and other Singular Tales . (Demler) BAUMGART, MATTHEW TODD, B.S. Common App Essay Questions! (University of Chicago) 2002.
The Use of Effective Variables in High Energy Physics . Argumentative On Technology! (Georgi/Arkani-Hamed) BOEHM, JOSHUA ADAM ALPERN, B.S.E. (Case Western Reserve University) 2003. (Harvard University) 2005. A Measurement of Electron Neutrino Appearance with the MINOS Experimen t. Descriptive Essay Visit! (Feldman) CHEUNG, CLIFFORD WAYNE, B.S. (Yale University) 2004. (Harvard University) 2006. From the Action to the S-Matrix . Essay! (Georgi/Arkani-Hamed)
DORET, STEPHEN CHARLES B.A. On Confidence! (Williams College) 2002, A.M. (Harvard University) 2006. FALK, ABRAM LOCKHART, B.A. (Swarthmore College) 2003. (Harvard University) 2004. Electrical Plasmon Detection and Phase Transitions in argumentative on technology, Nanowires . (Park) HAFEZI, MOHAMMAD, (Sharif University of Technology, Tehran - Ecole Polytechnique, Paris) 2003. (Harvard University) 2005, Strongly interacting systems in AMO physics . (Lukin) HECKMAN, JONATHAN JACOB, A.B. (Princeton University) 2004. (Harvard University) 2005. F-theory Approach to Particle Physics . (Vafa) HICKEN, MALCOLM STUART, B.S. (Brigham Young University) 1999. (Harvard University) 2001.
Doubling the Nearby Supernova Type Ia Sample . (Stubbs/Kirshner) HOHENSEE, MICHAEL ANDREW, B.A. Is It A Dissertation In 2! (New York University) 2002. (Harvard University) 2004. Testing Fundamental Lorentz Symmetries of Light . (Walsworth) JIANG, LIANG, B.S. (California Institute of Technology) 2004. T owards Scalable Quantum Communication and Computation: Novel Approaches and Realizations . (Lukin) KAPLAN, JARED DANIEL, B.S. (Stanford University) 2005. Aspects of Holography . Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Georgi/Arkani-Hamed) KLEIN, MASON JOSEPH, B.S. (Calvin College) 2002. Slow and Stored Light in Atomic Vapor Cells . (Walsworth) KRICH, JACOB JONATHAN, B.A. (Swarthmore College) 2000, MMath (Oxford University) 2003. (Harvard University) 2004. LAHIRI, SUBHANEIL, M.A. (Oxford University) 2003.
Black holes from fluid mechanics. (Yin/Minwalla) LIN, YI-CHIA, B.S. (National Taiwan Normal University) 1999. (National Tsing Hua University) 2001. Elasticity of Biopolymer Networks. (Weitz) LUO, LINJIAO, B.S. (University of Science and Technology China) 2003. Thermotactic behavior in C. elegans and education Drosophila larvae. (Samuel) PADI, MEGHA, B.S. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2003. A Black Hole Quartet: New Solutions and Applications to String Theory. (Strominger) PASTRAS, GEORGIOS, DIPLOMA (University of Patras) 2002. (Harvard University) 2004. Thermal Field Theory Applications in Modern Aspects of High Energy Physics. Argumentative! (Denef/Arkani-Hamed) SHAFEE, REBECCA, B.S. Publish Research Papers! (California Institute of Technology) 2002. (Harvard University) 2004. Measuring Black Hole Spin. (Narayan/McClintock)
WANG, CHRISTINE YI-TING, B.S. (National Taiwan University) 2002. (Harvard University) 2004. Multiode dynamics in Quantum Cascade Lasers: from coherent instability to mode locking. (Hoffman/Capasso) ZHANG, YIMING, B.S. (Peking University) 2003. (Harvard University) 2006. Waves, Particles, and Interactions in Reduced Dimensions . Argumentative! (Marcus) BARTHEL, CHRISTIAN, Diploma (University of Kaiserslautern) 2005. Control and application essays for harvard university Fast Measurement of on technology Spin Qubits . On Importance! (Marcus) CAVANAUGH, STEVEN, B.S. (Rutgers College) 2005. (Harvard University) 2006. CHERNG, ROBERT, WEN-CHIEH, B.S. On Technology! (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2004. Non-Equilibrium Dynamics and Novel Quantum Phases of Multicomponent Ultracold Atoms . (Demler) FOLETTI, SANDRA ELISABETTA, Diploma (Federal Institute of Technology Zurich) 2004.
Manipulation and Coherence of a Two-Electron Logical Spin Qubit Using GaAs Double Quantum Dots . (Yacoby) GIRASH, JOHN ANDREW, B.S. (University of common app essay questions Western Ontario) 1990. (University of Western Ontario) 1993. A Fokker-Planck Study of Dense Rotating Stellar Clusters . (Stubbs/Field) GOODSELL, ANNE LAUREL, B.A. (Bryn Mawr College) 2002. (Harvard University) 2004. Capture of Laser-Cooled Atoms with a Carbon Nanotube . (Hau)
GORSHKOV, ALEXEY VYACHESLAVOVICH, A.B. (Harvard College) 2004. (Harvard University) 2006. GUISE, NICHOLAS DAMIEN SUN-WO, B.S. (California Institute of Technology) 2003. Spin-Flip Resolution Achieved with a One-Proton Self-Excited Oscillator. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Gabrielse) HARTMAN, THOMAS EDWARD, A.B. (Princeton University) 2004. Extreme Black Hole Holography. (Strominger) HIGH, FREDRICK WILLIAM, B.A. (University of California Berkeley) 2004. The Dawn of Wide-Field Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Cluster Surveys: Efficient Optical Follow-Up. (Stubbs) HOOGERHEIDE, DAVID PAUL, B.S. (Western Michigan University) 2004.
Stochastic Processes in Solid State Nanoporers. Of Value Education In School! (Golovchenko) HUMMON, MATTHEW TAYLOR, B.A. (Amherst College) 2002, (Harvard University) 2005. Magnetic trapping of atomic nitrogen and cotrapping of NH. (Doyle) KATS, YEVGENY, B.S. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Bar-Ilan University) 2003. (Bar-Ilan University) 2005. Physics of Conformal Field Theories. (Georgi/Arkani-Hamed) KOROLEV, KIRILL SERGEEVICH, B.S. (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology) 2004. Statistical Physics of Topological Emulsions and common for 2014 Expanding Populations. (Nelson)
LAIRD, EDWARD ALEXANDER, M.Phys (University of Oxford) 2002. (Harvard University) 2005. LAROCHELLE, PHILIPPE, B.S. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2003. Machines and argumentative on technology Methods for Trapping Antihydrogen. (Gabrielse) LI, GENE-WEI, B.S. Application Essays! (National Tsinghua University) 2004. Single-Molecule Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Living Bacteria. (Nelson/Xie) MAZE RIOS, JERONIMO, B.S. (Pont Catholic University), 2002. (Pont Catholic University) 2004.
Quantum Manipulation of Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond: from Basic Properties to Applications. (Lukin) PATTERSON, DAVID, A.B. (Harvard College) 1997. Buffer Gas Cooled Beams and Cold Molecular Collisions. (Doyle) PENG, AMY WAN-CHIH, B.Sc. (University of Auckland), (Australian National University) 2005. Optical Lattices with Quantum Gas Microscope . (Greiner) QI, YANG, B.S. (Tsinghua University) 2005. ROJAS, ENRIQUE ROBERTSON, B.A. (University of Pennsylvania) 2003. The Physics of Tip-Growing Cells. (Nelson/Dumais) SEO, JIHYE, B.S. (Korea Adv. Inst. of Science Technology) 2003. (Harvard University) 2010. SIMON, JONATHAN, B.S. (California Institute of Technology) 2004.
Cavity QED with Atomic Ensembles. (Lukin/Vuletic) SLATYER, TRACY ROBYN, Ph.B. (Australian National University) 2005. Argumentative! (Harvard University) 2008. Signatures of a New Force in the Dark Matter Sector. Papers! (Finkbeiner) TAFVIZI, ANAHITA, B.S. (Sharif University of Technology) 2004. Single-Molecule and Computational Studies of Protein-DNA Interactions. (Cohen/Mirny/van Oijen) WINKLER, MARK THOMAS, B.S.E. (Case Western Reserve) 2004. Non-Equilibrium Chalcogen Concentrations in Silicon: Physical Structure, Electronic Transport, and essay on technology Photovoltaic Potential. (Mazur) ANNINOS, DIONYSIOS Theodoros,B.A. (Cornell University) 2006, (Harvard University) 2008. Classical and Quantum Symmetries of de Sitter Space . (Strominger) BAKR, WASEEM S., B.S. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2005. Microscopic studies of quantum phase transitions in optical lattices . (Greiner) BARAK, GILAD, B.S. (Hebrew University) 2000, (Tel Aviv University) 2006.
Momentum resolved tunneling study of interaction effects in ID electron systems .(Yacoby) BARANDES, JACOB AARON, B.A. (ColumbiaUniversity) 2004. Exploring Supergravity Landscapes . (Denef) BISWAS, RUDRO RANA, B.S. (Calcutta University) 2003, (Harvard University) 2011. CHEN, PEIQIU, B.S. (University of Science and Technology China) 2004, (Harvard University) 2005. Molecular evolution and thermal adaptation . (Nelson/Shakhnovich) FREUDIGER, CHRISTIAN WILHELM, Diploma (Technische Universitat of Munchen) 2005, (Harvard University) 2007.
Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS) Microscopy . (Zhuang/Xie) GALLICCHIO, JASON RICHARD, B.S. (University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign) 1999, (University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign) 2001. A Multivariate Approach to Jet Substructure and Jet Superstructure . (Schwartz) GLENDAY, ALEXANDER, B.A. (Williams College) 2002. Progress in Tests of Fundamental Physics Using a 3He and 129Xe Zeeman Maser . (Stubbs/Walsworth)
GOLDMAN, JOSHUA DAVID, A.B. (Cornell University) 2002, (University of Cambridge) 2003, (Imperial College London) 2004. Planar Penning Traps with Anharmonicity Compensation for essays for harvard Single-Electron Qubits. (Gabrielse) HUH, YEJIN, B.S. (Yale University) 2006, (Harvard University) 2008. KASHIF, LASHKAR, B.S. (Yale University) 2003. Measurement of the argumentative Z boson cross-section in the dimuon channel in pp collisions at research, sqrt = 7 TeV . Essay! (Huth) KAZ, DAVID MARTIN, B.S. (University of Arizona) 2003, (Harvard University) 2008. Colloidal Particles and Liquid Interfaces: A Spectrum of Interactions. (Manoharan)
KOLTHAMMER, WILLIAM STEVEN, B.S. (Harvey Mudd College) 2004, (Harvard University) 2006. Antimatter Plasmas Within a Penning-Ioffe Trap . (Gabrielse) LEE-BOEHM, CORRY LOUISE, B.S.E. (University of Colorado) 2004, (Harvard University) 2011. B0 Meson Decays to rho0 K*0, f0 K*0, and rho- K*+, Including Higher K* Resonances . (Morii) LI, GENE-WEI, B.S. (National Tsinghua University) 2004, (Harvard University) 2006. Single-Molecule Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Living Bacteria . Application For Harvard! (Nelson/Xie) MARTINEZ-OUTSCHOORN, VERENA INGRID, B.A. (Harvard University) 2004, (Harvard University) 2007. Measurement of the Charge Asymmetry of W Bosons Produced in pp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS Detector . (Guimaraes da Costa)
MCCONNELL, ROBERT PURYEAR, B.S. (Stanford University) 2005, (Harvard University) 2007. Laser-Controlled Charge-Exchange Production of Antihydrogen . (Gabrielse) MCGORTY, RYAN, B.S. (University of Massachusetts) 2005, (Harvard University) 2008. Colloidal Particles at Fluid Interfaces and argumentative essay on technology the Interface of Colloidal Fluids . (Manoharan) METLITSKI, MAXIM A., B.Sc. (University of British Columbia) 2003, (University of essay British Columbia) 2005. MOON, EUN GOOK, B.S. (Seoul National University) 2005.
PETERSON, COURTNEY MARIE, B.S. (Georgetown University) 2002,(University of Cambridge) 2003, (Imperial College London) 2004, (Harvard University) 2007. Testing Multi-Field Inflation . (Stubbs/Tegmark) PIELAWA, SUSANNE, Diploma (UNIVERSITY OF ULM) 2006, (Harvard University) 2009. PRASAD, SRIVAS, A.B. (Princeton University) 2005, (Harvard University) 2007. Measurement of the Cross-Section of W Bosons Produced in pp Collisions at vs=7 TeV With the argumentative essay on technology ATLAS Detector . (Guimaraes da Costa) ROMANOWSKY, MARK, B.A. How To Publish Research! (Swarthmore College) 2003. High Throughput Microfluidics for argumentative on technology Materials Synthesis . (Weitz) SMITH, BEN CAMPBELL, B.A. (Harvard University) 2005. Measurement of the Transverse Momentum Spectrum of W Bosons Produced at vs = 7 TeV using the essays ATLAS Detector . (Morii)
TANJI, HARUKA, B.S. (University of Tokyo) 2002, (University of essay Tokyo) 2005, (Harvard University) 2009. Few-Photon Nonlinearity with an Atomic Ensemble in is it to write a dissertation in 2, an Optical Cavity . (Lukin/Vuletic) TRODAHL, HALVAR JOSEPH, B. Sc. (Victoria University) 2005, (Harvard University) 2008. Low Temperature Scanning Probe Microscope for Imaging Nanometer Scale Electronic Devices. (Westervelt) WILLIAMS, TESS, B.Sc. (Stanford University) 2005. Nanoscale Electronic Structure of Cuprate Superconductors Investigated with Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy. (Hoffman) ANDERSEN, JOSEPH, B.S. (Univ. of Queensland) 1999. Investigations of the essay Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves and the Madden-Julian Oscillation. Application University! (Huth) BREDBERG, IRENE, M.PHYS., M.Sc. (Univ. of Oxford) 2006, 2007.
The Einstein and argumentative the Navier-Stokes Equations: Connecting the Two . (Strominger) CHURCHILL, HUGH, B.A., B.M. (Oberlin College) 2006. Quantum Dots in Gated Nanowires and Nanotubes. Essay! (Marcus) Inelastic Collisions of Atomic Antimony, Aluminum, Eerbium and Thulium Below . (Doyle) CORDOVA, CLAY, B.A. (Columbia University) 2007.
Supersymmetric Spectroscopy. (Vafa) DILLARD, COLIN, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2006. Quasiparticle Tunneling and High Bias Breakdown in the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. (Kastner/Silvera) DOWD, JASON, A.B. (Washington Univ.) 2006;(Harvard Univ.) 2008. Interpreting Assessments of argumentative on technology Student Learning in the Introductory Physics Classroom and app essay questions for 2014 Laboratory. (Mazur) Applications of Many Body Dynamics of Solid State Systems to Quantum Metrology and Computation (Chamon/Sachdev) GUREVICH, YULIA, B.S. (Yale University) 2005. Preliminary Measurements for an Electron EDM Experiment in ThO. (Gabrielse) KAGAN, MICHAEL, B.S. (Univ. of Michigan) 2006; (Harvard Univ.) 2008.
Measurement of the W ± Z production cross section and limits on anomalous triple gauge couplings at vS = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector. (Morii) LIN, TONGYAN, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2007; (Harvard Univ.) 2009. Signals of Particle Dark Matter. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Finkbeiner) McCLURE, DOUGLAS, B.A. (Harvard University) 2006; (Harvard University) 2008. Interferometer-Based Studies of Quantum Hall Phenomena. (Marcus)
MAIN, ELIZABETH, B.S.(Harvey Mudd College) 2004; (Harvard Univ.) 2006. Investigating Atomic Scale Disordered Stripes in the Cuprate Superconductors with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. (Hoffman) Toward a Design Principle in Mesoscopic Systems . (Heller/Kaxiras) MULUNEH, MELAKU, B.A. (Swarthmore College) 2003. Soft colloids from p(NIPAm-co-AAc): packing dynamics and structure. (Weitz)
Effect of Curvature Squared Corrections to Gravitational Action on Viscosity-to-Entropy Ratio of the Dual Gauge Theory . (Denef) Nanoscale Imaging of Phase Transitions with Scanning Force Microscopy . (Hoffman) REAL, ESTEBAN, A.B. (Harvard University) 2002; (Harvard University) 2007. Models of visual processing by the retina. (Meister/Franklin) RICHERME, PHILIP, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2006; (Harvard University) 2008. Trapped Antihydrogen in common questions for 2014, Its Ground State. (Gabrielse) SANTOS, LUIZ, B.S. (Univ. Fed. Essay! Do Espito Santo) 2004. Topological Properties of Interacting Fermionic Systems. (Chamon/Halperin)
SCHLAFLY, EDWARD, B.S. (Stanford University) 2007; (Harvard University) 2011. Dust in essays, Large Optical Surveys. (Finkbeiner) SETIAWAN, WIDAGDO, B.S. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2007. Fermi Gas Microscope . (Greiner) SHUVE, BRIAN, B.A.Sc. (University of Toronto) 2007; (Harvard University) 2011. Dark and Light: Unifying the Origins of Dark and argumentative essay on technology Visible Matter. (Randall) SIMMONS-DUFFIN, DAVID, A.B., A.M. (Harvard University) 2006. Carving Out the Space of Conformal Field Theories. (Randall) TEMPEL, DAVID, B.A. On Confidence! (Hunter College) 2007.
Time-dependent density functional theory for open quantum systems and quantum computation. (Aspuru-Guzik/Cohen) VENKATCHALAM, VIVEK, S.B. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2006. Single Electron Probes of Fractional Quantum Hall States. (Yacoby) VLASSAREV, DIMITAR, B.S. (William and Mary) 2005; (Harvard University) 2007. WANG, WENQIN, B.S. (Univ. of essay Science and Technology of China) 2006. Structures and dynamics in live bacteria revealed by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. (Zhuang) Laser-Based Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy of Topological Insulators. (Gedik / Hoffman) Symmetry Breaking in Neuronal Development. (Yanik /Levine) YONG, EE HOU, B.Sc. (Stanford University) 2003. Problems at how to research, the Nexus of Geometry and Soft Matter: Rings, Ribbons and Shells. (Mahadevan)
Explorations in de Sitter Space and Amorphous Black Hole Bound States in String Theory . (Strominger) Non-Equilibrium Dynamics of argumentative Artificial Quantum Matter . (Demler) Multiple Unnecessary Protein Sources and Cost to Growth Rate in E.coli. (Prentiss) CHIEN, YANG TING. Jet Physics at High Energy Colliders Matthew . (Schwartz) BAT Slew Survey (BATSS): Slew Data Analysis for the Swift-BAT Coded Aperture Imaging Telescope . (Stubbs) Getting Out of a Tight Spot: Physics of common questions for 2014 Flow Through Porous Materials . (Weitz) First Single Particle Measurements of the Proton and Antiproton Magnetic Moments . (Gabrielse) Quantum Jump Spectroscopy of a Single Electron in a New and Improved Apparatus . (Gabrielse ) Pathways to a Metallic Hydrogen . (Silvera) 4d Spectra from BPS Quiver Dualities. (Vafa)
New Methods to Create Multielectron Bubbles in Liquid Helium . (Silvera) Measurements of Interaction-Driven States in Monolayer and Bilayer Graphene . (Yacoby) FOGWELL HOOGERHEIDE, SHANNON. Trapped Positrons for High-Precision Magnetic Moment Measurements . (Gabrielse) Measuring the 3D Dynamics of Multiple Colloidal Particles with Digital Holographic Microscopy . (Manoharan) Controlling Atomic, Solid-State and Hybrid Systems for Quantum Information Processing. (Lukin) JAWERTH, LOUISE MARIE.
The Mechanics of Fibrin Networks and argumentative on technology their Alterations by Platelets . (Weitz) Measurement of the WZ Production Cross Section in Proton-Proton Collision at vs = 7 TeV and Limits on Anomalous Triple Gauge Couplings with the ATLAS Detector . (Franklin) Structure and essays on confidence Defects of Hard-Sphere Colloidal Crystals and Glasses . (Weitz) KAHAWALA, DILANI S. Topics on Hadron Collider Physics . (Randall) New Phenomena in Non-Equilibrium Quantum Physics . (Demler) Microscopic Properties of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect . (Halperin) Dynamics of Charged Colloids in Nonpolar Solvents . (Weitz)
Discrete Differential Geometry and Physics of Elastic Curves . (Mahadevan) Medford Spin Qubits in Double and Triple Quantum Dots . (Marcus/Yacoby) Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae and Preliminary Cosmological Constraints from the on technology ESSENCE Survey . (Stubbs) Properties of Unusually Luminous Supernovae . (Loeb) Brane Constructions and BPS Spectra . (Vafa) Optical Spectroscopy and Velocity Dispersions of SZ-selected Galaxy Clusters . (Stubbs) Intermediate Band Properties of Femtosecond-Laser Hyperdoped Silicon . (Mazur) Choe Modulated Nanowire Structures for Exploring New Nanoprocessor Architectures and Approaches to Biosensing. Is It Possible In 2 Weeks! (Lieber/Cohen) Chirality of Light and argumentative on technology Its Interaction with Chiral Matter . (Cohen)
From Hopping to Ballistic Transport in Graphene-Based Electronic Devices . (Jarillo-Herrero/Yacoby) Future Probes of Cosmology and the High-Redshift Universe . (Loeb) Visualizing the Interplay of essays Structural and Electronic Disorders in High-Temperature Superconductors using Scanning Tunneling Microscopy . (Hoffman) ZEVI DELLA PORTA, GIOVANNI. Measurement of the Cross-Section for W Boson Production in Association With B-Jets in Proton-Proton Collisions at vS = 7 Tev at the LHC Using the argumentative on technology ATLAS Detector . (Franklin)
LinkInelastic collisions of atomic thorium and molecular thorium monoxide with cold helium-3. (Doyle) Coherent Scattering in Two Dimensions: Graphene and Quantum Corrals . (Heller) Higher Spin Holography. (Yin) Quantum optics with atom-like systems in diamond. (Lukin) Data-Driven Analysis of Mitotic Spindles . (Needleman/Kaxiras) Nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic sensing using atomic defects in diamond. (Yacoby) Elasticity of possible to write in 2 Compressed Emulsions . (Weitz) LinkLow Dimensional Carbon Electronics. (Jarillo-Herrero/Yacoby) LinkImproving the Limit on the Electron EDM: Data Acquisition and Systematics Studies in the ACME Experiment. (Gabrielse) Dynamics in Biological Soft Materials . Argumentative! (Cohen)
Site-Resolved Imaging with the Fermi Gas Microscope. (Greiner) Light-Shell Theory Foundations. (Georgi) From Petrov-Einstein to Navier-Stokes. (Strominger) Engineered Potentials and Dynamics of Ultracold Quantum Gases under the Microscope. Education In School! (Greiner) Coherent control of diamond defects for argumentative essay on technology quantum information science and quantum sensing. (Lukin) Aspects of Symmetry in de Sitter Space. (Strominger)
Distortions in Genealogies due to Purifying Selection. (Desai) A Study of the Radial and Azimuthal Gas Distribution in common for 2014, Massive Galaxy Clusters. (Stubbs) Properties of Dark Matter Halos and Novel Signatures of Baryons in Them . (Loeb) Structure and Properties of essay on technology Charged Colloidal Systems. (Weitz) Diamond Platforms for Nanoscale Photonics and Metrology. Place! (Lukin)
A Ten-Fold Improvement to the Limit of the Electron Electric Dipole Moment. (Gabrielse) Topology, Localization, and Quantum Information in argumentative, Atomic, Molecular and Optical Systems. (Lukin) Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy of Topological Insulators and Cuprate Superconductors. (Hoffman) BENJAMIN, DAVID ISAIAH. Impurity Physics in application essays for harvard, Resonant X-Ray Scattering and essay Ultracold Atomic Gases . (Demler)
Theoretical Considerations for Experiments to Create and Detect Localised Majorana Modes in essay visit, Electronic Systems. Argumentative Essay On Technology! (Halperin/Yacoby) Superconducting Proximity Effect in InAs Nanowires . (Marcus/Yacoby) Exploring Black Hole Dynamics . (Randall) INCORVIA, JEAN ANNE CURRIVAN. Nanoscale Magnetic Materials for Energy-Efficient Spin Based Transistors. (Westervelt) FEIGE, ILYA ERIC ALEXANDER. Factorization and Precision Calculations in Particle Physics. (Schwartz) Terahertz Electrodynamics of Dirac Fermions in essays, Graphene. (Hoffman) Novel Trapping and Scattering of Light in Resonant Nanophotonic Structures. (Cohen) Integrated nanoscale tools for on technology interrogating living cells. (Park)
KALRA, RITA RANI. An Improved Antihydrogen Trap. (Gabrielse) KOLKOWITZ, SHIMON JACOB. Nanoscale Sensing with Individual Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond. (Lukin) LAVRENTOVICH, MAXIM OLEGOVICH. Diffusion, Absorbing States, and of value in school Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Range Expansions and Evolution. (Nelson) Selected Topics in Scattering Theory: From Chaos to argumentative on technology, Resonance. (Heller)
LOCKHART, GUGLIELMO PAUL. Self-Dual Strings of Six-Dimensional SCFTs . (Vafa) Structural Color from app essay, Colloidal Glasses. (Manoharan) Nonlinear Optical and Optoelectronic Studies of Topological Insulator Surfaces. (Hoffman) MEISNER, AARON MICHAEL. Full-sky, High-resolution Maps of Interstellar Dust. (Finkbeiner) MERCURIO, KEVIN MICHAEL. A Search for essay on technology the Higgs Boson Produced in Association with a Vector Boson Using the ATLAS Detector at the LHC. (Huth) NOWOJEWSKI, ANDRZEJ KAZIMIERZ. Pathogen Avoidance by Caenorhabditis Elegans is a Pheromone-Mediated Collective Behavior. (Levine)
PISKORSKI, JULIA HEGE. Cooling, Collisions and non-Sticking of Polyatomic Molecules in a Cryogenic Buffer Gas Cell. (Doyle) An Effective Theory on the Light Shell. (Georgi) SCHADE, NICHOLAS BENJAMIN. Self-Assembly of Plasmonic Nanoclusters for Optical Metafluids. On Confidence! (Manoharan) SHULMAN, MICHAEL DEAN. Entanglement and Metrology with Singlet-Triplet Qubits. (Yacoby) SPEARMAN, WILLIAM R. Measurement of the Mass and argumentative essay on technology Width of the Higgs Boson in essays on confidence, the H to ZZ to argumentative on technology, 4l Decay Channel Using Per-Event Response Information. (Guimaraes da Costa) THOMPSON, JEFFREY DOUGLAS. A Quantum Interface Between Single Atoms and Nanophotonic Structures. (Lukin)
WANG, TOUT TAOTAO. Small Diatomic Alkali Molecules at Ultracold Temperatures. (Doyle) Beam Characterization and Systematics of the Bicep2 and Keck Array Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiments. (Kovac) Slow Dynamics in Quantum Matter: the Role of Dimensionality, Disorder and Dissipation. (Demler) Quantum electronic transport in mesoscopic graphene devices. Essays! (Yacoby) Laser Slowing of CaF Molecules and Progress towards a Dual-MOT for Li and CaF. Essay On Technology! (Doyle)
Aspects of Statistical Fluctuations in Evolutionary and Population Dynamics. (Nelson) Interplay of Broken Symmetries and Quantum Criticality in Correlated Electronic Systems. (Sachdev) Search for New Physics in Dijet Invariant Mass Spectrum. Essays On Confidence! (Huth) Jets and Metastability in essay, Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory. (Schwartz) Advances in Ab Initio Modeling of the Many-Body Effects of essays on confidence Dispersion Interactions in Functional Organic Materials. (Aspuru-Guzik/Ni) Molecular evolution in rapidly evolving populations. (Desai) Electronic Phenomena in argumentative, Two-Dimensional Topological Insulators. (Yacoby) Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Study on Strongly Correlated Materials. (Hoffman) Quantum Dots for Conventional and Topological Qubits. (Marcus/Westervelt) Nanoscale Investigations of papers High-Temperature Superconductivity in a Single. Atomic Layer of Iron Selenide. (Hoffman)
The Collective Action Problem in a Social and a Biophysical System. (Mahadevan) A classical perspective on non-diffractive disorder. (Heller) Development of a Trajectory Model for the Analysis of Stratospheric Water Vapor. (Anderson/Heller) Quantum Information Science and Quantum Metrology: Novel Systems and Applications. Essay On Technology! (Lukin) Coupled Spins in Diamond: From Quantum Control to Metrology and Many-Body Physics. (Lukin) Observation of the Higgs boson in the WW* channel and publish papers search for essay on technology Higgs boson pair production in the bb ?bb ? channel with the ATLAS detector. (Franklin) Novel quantum phase transitions in low-dimensional systems. (Sachdev)
Conformal Bootstrap in Two Dimensions. (Yin) Transport and hydrodynamics in holography, strange metals and graphene. Application For Harvard! (Sachdev) Modeling, Inference and Optimization with Composable Differentiable Procedures. (Adams/Cohen) Probing the Hubbard model with single-site resolution. (Greiner) Distributions of essay on technology Gas and Galaxies from Galaxy Clusters to Larger Scales. Essays For Harvard University! (Eisenstein/Loeb/Finkbeiner) The Classical-Quantum Correspondence of argumentative on technology Polyatomic Molecules. (Heller) Simulating the essay on importance in school Cosmic Gas: From Globular Clusters to the Most Massive Haloes. (Randall) Gravitational waves from the Kerr/CFT correspondence. (Strominger) Atomic Bose-Hubbard systems with single-particle control. (Greiner) Supersymmetric Particles in Four Dimensions. (Yin) Search for Weak Gaugino Production in Final States with One Lepton, Two b-jets Consistent with a Higgs Boson, and Missing Transverse Momentum with the ATLAS detector. (Huth)
Connect with us: Copyright 2017 The Presidents and Fellows of argumentative Harvard College.
Write My Research Paper for Me -
Technology Argumentative Essay - 763 Words | Bartleby
Analysis of Performance GCSE PE Coursework. Extracts from argumentative on technology this document. Analysis of performance coursework I am analysing myself on the position I play in football which is centre back. The important skills needed in order to play centre back are: * Power * Balance * Coordination * Agility * Timing * Control These skills are important for: * Power is important so the player is able to strike the ball hard enough to clear it from danger. It is possible in 2 weeks also important so the player can jump high to win headers. * Balance is important so the argumentative essay on technology player is able to publish stay on argumentative essay on technology their feet whilst landing after jumping for a header and taking on players. To Write In 2 Weeks! * Coordination is important in order to argumentative essay on technology run and header at the same time and to how to publish papers run and kick at the same time. * Agility is important so the essay player is able to how to publish research take on argumentative essay on technology players whilst coming out of defence. It is how to publish research also important for the layer so he is able to keep track of his marker whilst his marker tries to essay on technology lose him in and out of players. * Timing is important so the player is able to kick and header the ball at the right time to is it to write a dissertation in 2 get the best effect. * Control is important in order to able to control high balls. On Technology! The fitness components that are needed to play centre back successfully are: * Speed * Flexibility * Cardiovascular endurance * Speed endurance * Power * Acceleration These fitness components are needed for: * Speed is essays on confidence needed in order to keep up with the pace of the game and to essay keep track of your marker. * Flexibility is useful when playing centre because it helps you to intercept passes and control high passes with your feet. * Cardiovascular endurance is needed so the player is able to keep moving for the whole length of the match. * Speed endurance is needed so the player is able to keep up with their marker when through balls are played throughout the whole match. . read more. During this time you must be moderately active which means working at about 60-80% of your maximum heart rate (MHR). Continuous training is essential for everyone who takes part in activities for a long period of time.
Fartlek training can simply be modified to work on improving cardiovascular endurance just by making the sessions longer and including more running. My second weakness that I find I have is passing with my left foot, and my third weakness is heading. These two weaknesses could be combined and improved on essay of value in school in the same session. Circuit training could be used to improve these two weaknesses and instead of essay, using health based exercises at each station, skill based exercises could replace them. For example at the first station the exercise could be passing the publish research ball onto a wall with your left foot as many times as possible in 45 seconds. To judge to see if you are improving you count the number of times you pass the ball successfully and compare with your next set of essay on technology, results. At the second station the same thing could be done but using headers instead. Another way of improving these weaknesses is by doing a skills training session. For this it is best to involve other players so they can help you improve. To improve heading there could be three extra players; a goal keeper, someone to cross balls in and a defender.
First a player would cross the ball in and I would be trying to app essay questions for 2014 win the header and argumentative on technology header at goal, the job of the defender is to win the ball and the goal keeper's job is obviously to save it. This would help me to improve my heading accuracy whilst I go up for for harvard university corners, it would also get me more used to heading in a game situation. Once about 15-20 balls have been delivered I would then swap with the crosser and then cross balls in essay on technology, with my left foot in on importance of value, order to improve it. Argumentative Essay! . read more. As a result of the six week training programme I would expect to see a good improvement in not only the test results but in a competitive match as well. I would hope that I would find it a lot easier running around for common app essay for 2014 the whole match and I would think that I would have improved my weaknesses as well as my strengths. My next steps once I have finished the essay on technology training programme are to focus on place visit any other weaknesses that could be improved. I will also keep on concentrating partly on my previous weaknesses, but not as intensely because I now have more important weaknesses. These weaknesses are speed endurance and coordination. I will write up an additional training programme in order to improve these other weaknesses.
However due to on technology the six week training programme I will not yet be good enough at my previous weaknesses in order to call them my strengths, therefore I will need to carry on working on them but not as often. I will write up another six week training programme and in one of those weeks I will include working on my previous weaknesses, in this week I will carry out the same sort of training methods but do them more intensely as I should be better at them. In the other five weeks I will still include one of those training methods once a week but for the rest of the week I will concentrate on improving my other weaknesses. On Confidence! To improve my speed endurance I will need to include training methods such as interval training in my programme. I used interval training in my previous programme but in order to on technology aim it specifically at speed endurance I will need to add more sprints in to it. To improve my coordination I will carry out descriptive place, a circuit training programme that will include various activities to improve my coordination, then I will repeat them three or four times. . read more.
This student written piece of on technology, work is on confidence one of many that can be found in our GCSE Exercise and Training section. Start learning 29% faster today 150,000+ documents available Just £6.99 a month. Join over 1.2 million students every month Accelerate your learning by on technology, 29% Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month. Related GCSE Exercise and how to publish research Training essays. Essay On Technology! Speed of reaction- when a player hears a call for the ball, how long it takes for him/her to pass it * Timing-choosing to tackle when the ball is away from the opponent's feet. * Speed- getting to the ball before the opposition All of the above are demands which. Strategies/Tactics Strengths: Starts and turns I know this tactic is a strength in my performance because, when I dive into the water I can determine how long I spend gliding in a streamline position under water. I know this is how to research a good strategy because my coach informs me I have a good streamlined position. GCSE P.E coursework - circuit training. from getting strained. Following this you must prepare yourself mentally. To do this you must do a specific activity - Like in football, to prepare yourself mentally, you may do some football shooting, or some heading or maybe some passing of a football. This is my client's 6-week training programme, his main sport is argumentative volleyball and he . Common App Essay Questions! My muscles started to get tired at the end.
Weights felt lighter than before. Until the third set, I began to feel it become more difficult. Improving my muscular strength and reps. Flexibility Exercise (Stretches) 1-2 minutes My stretches were good. Essay On Technology! An example of on importance education, a sport specific training course could be: 1. press ups 2. sit ups 3. squats 4. star jumps 5. Essay! chin ups 6. bur pass 7. tricep dips 8. short rest 9. repeat Continuous training requires you to have your oxygen intake to be matched by the body's demand for oxygen. The first step will be to identify Adamsweaknesses and strengths in Long Jump and . This increased his balance when running also.
Overview of session: * His balance and timing was bad only when he was at speed. * Adams potential is great as he can adapt his posture and essays on confidence technique when I ask him. which is argumentative essay on technology getting in the way of a pass, and a phase of how to papers, play in the backs may be better than one in the forwards. I need to stay in the rucks and mauls more often that I stand in the line. PEP and performance analysis for rounders. (a) List in detail the strengths of the player/competitor/participant. Essay On Technology! In Rounders I'm good at hitting the ball when batting; in order for me to do this I had good hand and is it a dissertation in 2 eye co-ordination. Essay On Technology! When batting it is good to have good hand and eye coordination because it determines whether a hit will be good or bad, I think the. of app essay questions, student written work Annotated by. experienced teachers Ideas and feedback to.
improve your own work. Marked by Teachers, The Student Room and Get Revising are all trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd. Argumentative Essay! TurnItIn the anti-plagiarism experts are also used by: Want to read the rest? Sign up to view the whole essay and download the PDF for anytime access on your computer, tablet or smartphone. Start learning 29% faster today 150,000+ documents available Just £6.99 a month.
Looking for expert help with your Physical Education (Sport Coaching) work? Created by essays on confidence, teachers, our study guides highlight the argumentative on technology really important stuff you need to know.
Pay for Exclusive Essay -
Getting A Sample Of An Argumentative Essay On Technology
excavation resume On too many projects, the Construction Supervisor allows the argumentative essay on technology Excavation Foreman to make most of the major decisions for the site work staging and planning. It seems to make sense to allow the Excavation Foreman to make these decisions, since his crews are doing the work. This assumption causes many problems on on importance education, projects that could have been easily avoided. The Excavation Foreman generally focuses on the most efficient method to get his required work items done. Generally the excavator's goals can be visualized if the dirt were being moved with a stick; pushed from the high areas to the nearest low areas with a minimum of carrying.
Sometimes the most efficient method for the Excavation Foreman is also the best plan for the entire project. Many times, though, project complexities exist that are beyond the excavator’s scope of argumentative on technology work. In these cases, the Construction Supervisor should make sure the planning considers what is best for the entire project, not just for the Excavator. A simple method that works well involves a color marked site plan that the Construction Supervisor develops just for job staging and planning. The Construction Supervisor needs to consider fill pile locations, topsoil pile locations, haul roads, building layout points, building material storage locations, parking areas, office trailer locations, etc for the various phases of the project. Perhaps several color marked up site plans will be needed to for harvard university, show what happens at the various project stages. Each project is different and requires a slightly different approach. But the one consistent rule: lack of site work planning for the various project stages by the Construction Supervisor will definitely not achieve an optimized project.
A good Construction Supervisor considers the various requirements for foundation, site utilities, access and storage, dewatering, etc. and helps plan a detailed sequence of excavation. This planning process should include as many of the effected parties as possible to argumentative essay, insure success. Be forewarned, it will be difficult to get people to take the time to plan. Planning, by essays, definition, involves taking uncertain dates and requirements and looking into the future to on technology, make decisions. Many people are uncomfortable with this process and will try to avoid it. Good planning requires thought and negotiating and is hard mental work. How Erosion and Sedimentation Control Start the Project?
In recent years, erosion control on construction sites has become an issue. Many state and local governments have statutes requiring erosion control for construction projects. Often inspectors have the authority to shut-down an essays entire project for erosion control concerns. The effects of erosion can be summarized as three-fold: Damage to stream channels: stream channels downstream become filled with sediment and flooding can occur. Damage to water: sediment lowers water quality for argumentative essay on technology municipal and industrial use. Is It Possible A Dissertation In 2. Damage to property: sediment buries lawns, fills ditches, clogs storm sewers, culverts and inlets, and argumentative essay on technology, injures fish. Obviously erosion should be controlled for both legal and practical reasons. Erosion is defined as the detachment and is it a dissertation in 2 weeks, transportation of soil particles.
Rain falling on argumentative essay, bare soil detaches particles and as the rainwater runs off soil erosion occurs in proportion to the water volume and velocity. The eroded soil particles are deposited when the water slows and the soil particles settle. Erosion can be controlled through both mechanical and vegetable measures. One of the most effective mechanical measures involves grading, or disturbing, only those areas immediately needed for construction. Limiting the area of exposed, bare soil greatly reduces erosion. This method of erosion control can often appear to possible to write a dissertation, be at odds with the excavator's goal of completing the project quickly and efficiently. Adequate planning of the essay on technology grading work, which always involves considering several different options, may reveal a solution that meets both the goals of erosion control and efficient grading. Subsurface trench drains, discussed in the groundwater section of this chapter, are another means of controlling erosion.
Trench drains can divert water at the top of a slope or collect and carry fast moving water away at possible in 2 weeks, the bottom of a slope. Swales and berms can also be used to divert and channel run-off. On Technology. Before leaving the site, this run-off must be slowed to allow the sediment to settle. Sediment basins are used to detain runoff and trap sediment. A well constructed sediment basin should have capacity to hold adequate runoff, prevent runoff short-circuits past the basin, and be accessible to clean-out sediment.
Vegetative measures to reduce erosion control can be very efficient and economical. The slope of the site and fertility of the soil help determine the effectiveness of vegetative measures. Is It A Dissertation Weeks. Straw, or other fibrous, mulch can be applied directly to soil slopes during an unfavorable time of year for seeding. Straw mulches are usually applied at argumentative, 1- 1 / 2 tons per acre. Essay On Importance Education. Straw mulching must be anchored asphalt tack spray, straight blade, disking, or netting. There are times in the year when permanent seeding is on technology prohibited, but temporary seeding may be successful. Annual rye grass, small grain, sudangrass and millet are often used for temporary seeding and, with a little luck from the elements, do an excellent job of preventing erosion. App Essay For 2014. The ideal situation, generally, is to install permanent seeding as soon as grading is complete in an area. If required, sod can be placed in almost any weather conditions and argumentative essay on technology, can reduce erosion almost immediately.
What You should Know about Clearing and Grubbing? The process of removing and disposing of brush and questions, trees is described as clearing. Grubbing is defined as removal and disposal of stumps and argumentative essay on technology, roots. Clearing and application university, grubbing is generally performed concurrently in order to ready the site for topsoil stripping and bulk excavation. Since clearing and grubbing happens as the first work item on the project, it is usually critical to the project schedule. Therefore, the Construction Supervisor needs to understand the process of argumentative essay on technology clearing and grubbing in order to control the project. Clearing and grubbing is often thought of as a simple process, but there are many options and complexities involved. There are several methods of disposing of brush, trees and common, stumps, depending on project conditions and local ordinances.
Brush and small trees (seedlings and saplings) can be burned, buried or chipped. In order to discuss tree usage it is helpful to use the U.S. Argumentative Essay. Forest Service size classification. Name Diameter in inches at breast height or (DBH) Veterans Over 24” Poles may be burned, buried, salvaged for future use or sold.
While standard and veteran size trees are often salable to saw mills. Burning of material on the job site should be thoroughly investigated prior to beginning. State environmental laws and local ordinances should be checked. If burning is allowed, it can be an efficient and low cost way of disposing of brush, trees and stumps. Usually a good, hot fire can be started with brush and essays, small trees. Stumps can be burned if the equipment operator places the stumps correctly on a hot fire. Burial is another economical way to dispose of stumps and trees, but it must be approved by the project owner. Be aware that large stump holes, which are often filled in with loose, un-compacted soil, become settlement problems. Don't allow the Sitework Contractor to just bury at the most convenient spot, causing a later problem for you or the Owner.
The actual procedure of burying stumps and argumentative on technology, logs is how to straight-forward although considerable care should be given to the location of essay on technology buried items. The simple process of installing a conduit 4’-0” below grade can turn into a huge mess if one runs into a buried stump or tree. Application University. As this is often a problem that one subcontractor unwittingly creates for argumentative essay another, the Construction Supervisor should be aware about the burying of material on the project site. Chipping, hauling away and application university, sales to a lumber mill are also methods of disposal. Essay On Technology. These methods usually require less involvement for how to publish research the Construction Supervisor.
While considering the clearing and grubbing, keep the following items in mind: amount and type of trees and brush, dangers from dead limbs, soil conditions when wet, possibility of working over frozen soil, and general access to the site. What to Consider for Site and Building Demolition? Site demolition includes removal of catch basins, manholes, underground pipe, asphalt paving, concrete paving, etc. The method of disposal of argumentative on technology site demolition materials can have a large impact on a project. If the material is hauled to possible to write, a dump site, the Construction Supervisor should know the dump site location and be assured that the dumping meets all state and local ordinances.
I've had a major project can be stopped because a neighbor to the dump site complained and argumentative on technology, found that we didn't have the proper permits. It is simply not enough, in today's environment, to merely get permission of the landowner to place fill on their property. If site demolition materials are also disposed on site (either buried or broken and used for rip rap) the Design Professional or Owner should give requirements for this type of essays for harvard use (i.e. maximum size of fill lift, equipment used to compact, maximum size piece allowable, requirements for wood, rebar, etc. found in the materials, etc.). Another important question concerning site demolition work is limits of work. Argumentative Essay. The Construction Supervisor should be clear on what the limits are, who is application for harvard university responsible for establishing those limits in the field and who will be responsible for damages if those limits are exceeded. Argumentative. Limits should also be established for specific items of essays demolition. For example if a catch basin and storm pipe crossing an essay existing street must be removed, the Construction Supervisor should help determine if the pavement will be chisel cut or saw cut and the width of the cut. The Construction Supervisor can be very effective by keeping the information flowing if one subcontractor performs demolition and essays on confidence, another restoration. Building demolition can vary from removing some doors or walls in an existing structure to razing an entire building. The work is extremely varied and runs from the simple to the complex.
Understand the demolition requirements before you start! Building demolition work is usually not well understood at the onset of a project. Describing the work to essay on technology, be performed is necessarily tricky because it normally involves areas of unknowns. For example, it's difficult to know the material inside a wall that support a lintel. Regardless of the unknowns, the common for 2014 Construction Supervisor must work to clarify the intent of the argumentative on technology demolition work. Particular attention should be paid to transition areas where demolition work ends and existing materials remain. These transition areas are often not considered and can be very costly to resolve. Lastly, the Construction Supervisor must understand the contracted responsibilities for demolition and try to reveal and resolve changes as soon as possible.
One item that requires special mention regarding building demolition is how to publish hazardous materials. Due to the technical, health and legal problems involved, asbestos, lead paint, or any other hazardous material should be removed by qualified, licensed personnel only. The liabilities are so huge with these materials that the Construction Supervisor should defer decisions in argumentative this area to his employer. Demolition of an entire building falls somewhere between an art and a science. Usually the responsibility will be let to one subcontractor. The Construction Supervisor should understand the method to be used, precautions used to project neighboring buildings, techniques, if any, of monitoring of neighboring buildings for possible in 2 weeks damage, dump site location and requirements, and proposed finish condition of site for next contractor to argumentative, begin work. What You should Know about Earthwork Excavation and is it possible to write a dissertation in 2 weeks, Compaction? Earth excavation and grading can be a fascinating part of a construction project. The powerful heavy equipment, used to best advantage by a skilled operator, is a joy to on technology, behold. The scope of the excavation job varies from digging footings for a small building to moving millions of cubic yards of earth. The one thing all excavation jobs have in essays on confidence common, though, is that careful planning is the key to success.
There are several terms which should be defined. Excavation is often used as a broad term which includes cut (or excavation) and fill (or embankment). On Technology. Cut is defined as removing material to lower the elevation of an on importance area. Fill is defined as placing material to raise the argumentative on technology elevation of an area. Compaction must take place during a fill operation to essays for harvard university, increase the argumentative essay on technology density of the soil material being placed. Another common breakdown in excavation work is bulk excavation and on importance of value, trench excavation. Swell and shrinkage are two important, and often misunderstood, terms.
Consider the simple example of digging a 1.0 cubic yard hole with a shovel and throwing the dirt into wheelbarrows. In the ground the 1.0 cubic yard of on technology soil is in its virgin (or natural) state. Descriptive Visit. Upon being shoveled into the wheelbarrows the argumentative essay soil is in a loose (or lower density) state and probably has a volume of questions 1.2 to 1.4 cubic yards. This process of soil increasing in volume from its virgin state to a loose state is called swell. Shrinkage, on the other hand, occurs when that same soil is placed back in the one cubic yard hole and argumentative essay, is properly compacted. Depending on the soil type, the final volume could be 0.9 cubic yards or 1.1 cubic yards. The above explains why when one digs and research, refills a hole, sometimes there is not enough soil to fill the hole and sometimes there is soil left over. An excellent table showing weights, swell factors, and shrinkage factors for various materials is included below.
The table of characteristics is a growing body of knowledge with many contributors over the past 100 years. All the values given are necessarily approximate. The rock materials are labeled in the following way: I, igneous; S, sedimentary; or M, metamorphic. The cubic yard in cut column assumes natural moisture and has + 10 percent variation. The cubic yard loose column has a +33 percent variation. Argumentative. For example, damp clay with a given swell of descriptive essay visit 40 percent should be assumed to have a swell range of 30 percent to 53.2 percent. The cubic yard in fill column also has a 33 percent variation and assumes mechanical compaction at appropriate moisture levels. In earth excavation and site grading some of the most common problems encountered are improper compaction, incorrect final elevations, and working beyond the specified area to be disturbed. Argumentative Essay On Technology. There are no magic, simple answers or procedures to make the above problems not happen.
Improper soil compaction is papers a common, and argumentative essay on technology, often difficult problem. Soil Engineering and Geology, a previous section, discusses the place technical aspects of soil compaction. The practical, in the field problems include: Soil too wet: must be aerated or mixed with dryer materials. Soil to dry: must add water Soil lifts for compaction too deep: lessen lift depth Different types of soil: check if the proctor test (the test which measures the density of the essay soil sample for other tests to in 2 weeks, be measured against) matches the essay type of soil encountered The soils inspector holds-up the essays on confidence compaction operations to takes tests: try to argumentative on technology, create a team environment and plan test taking for everyone’s advantage. The problems of incorrect final elevations and how to research, working beyond the specified contract limits are more straight-forward.
The excavation contractor certainly should be responsible for their own work, the only real problem involves determining the mistake. The Construction Supervisor should be aware of this potential problem and essay, develop his own solution to resolve it. In general, the best solutions follow: The Construction Supervisor should be aware of the specific requirements as much as possible (i.e. understand the whole job) and common questions for 2014, spot check on occasions. Whenever practical the subcontractors following the site grading should check and argumentative on technology, accept the previous work prior to beginning. Even though the excavation contractor is ultimately responsible for their work, project schedule or quality can be ruined if errors are found too late. The above are some problems encountered in the field with possible solutions. In many cases the solutions seem simple to how to research, apply but are quite difficult and costly. Regardless of the complexity, the site work is almost always critical to the timely completion of the project and must be a priority for the Construction Supervisor. What are the Basic Pieces of essay on technology Site Equipment on a Project?
The advances in our ability to move earth and rock since the early 1900's is essay place visit truly impressive. Argumentative Essay. It’s a joy to watch a skilled operator produce on one of these technically evolved machines. Bud Caldwell, a great Construction Superintendent from the descriptive visit 1950s to the 1980s, remembered construction before the heavy equipment. As a boy, I helped with earthmoving on construction projects. There was a steel scoop with two handles that could be pulled like a plow.
I'd hook-up the team of argumentative on technology mules to this scoop and essays on confidence, drive through the excavation area, scraping a couple of inches of soil at each pass. It was a slow process. On Technology. But still much better then digging with a shovel and hauling with a wheelbarrow. The mules are now replaced with diesel engines and the scoop has been transformed to perform many specialized tasks. This section will briefly outline the most common equipment types and present some specific technical information. Though it is the Site Contractor's job to thoroughly understand the function, cost and maintenance of the equipment; the publish Construction Supervisor should understand basic heavy equipment characteristics and uses to help plan the job.
This review of equipment in not comprehensive, but rather an essay introduction to place, commonly used heavy equipment on building projects. The Bulldozer is a simple, versatile machine that has a tremendous number of uses. Generally a self-propelled track machine, the bulldozer pushes or pulls only. Conversely, a front end loader uses a front bucket to lift soil to argumentative, load a truck. The bulldozer uses include: Clearing and grubbing Grading earth for short haul distances Pushing scraper pans Ripping rock Spreading borrow fill General site maintenance. The sizes of bulldozers vary greatly from small machines that use 6-way tilt blades for fine grading to huge machines that need special permits to be hauled over bridges. These web links show equipment specifications for several common bulldozers. The Front-end Loader is another versatile piece of equipment, found on most projects at one time or another. Research. Always self-propelled, a front-end loader can be either rubber tire or a track machine. A front-end loader has a front bucket that tilts vertically to load and unload and lifts vertically.
The front-end loader uses include: Clearing and grubbing Excavate and carry soil Excavate and load soil into a truck Grading and spreading borrow (although less ideal then a bulldozer) On-site material transport (rebar, pumps, etc.) Particular attention should be paid when a front-end loader excavates and loads soil onto argumentative on technology, a truck. The loading cycle time can be simply analyzed, possibly improved, and also used to predict production quantities for planning decisions These web links show equipment specifications for several common front-end loaders. Scrapers or Pans excavate soil in one location, haul and for 2014, dump the soil in another spot. It is difficult to match the efficiency of scrapers for essay cut/fill soil operation if the haul distance is less then a mile. Scrapers are generally pulled by a rubber tire wheel tractor and are sometimes pushed through the cut area by a bulldozer. These web links show equipment specifications for several common scrapers. There are many times that scrapers are not used for site grading and a dump truck is employed: the common questions haul may be to long, the on technology haul may cross roads where scrapers are not permitted, hard rock may be encountered, equipment availability, etc. Dump trucks are in common use and probably require little discussion.
The Construction Supervisor should be aware of is it possible a dissertation a difference in bed types. Many trucks have a top-hinged tailgate that cannot dump any rock wider then the tailgate width. Rock body beds, on the other hand, have no tailgates and can dump any size rock, although their volume capacity is diminished. These web links show equipment specifications for several common dump trucks. Compaction Equipment increases the density of the soil and in some cases provides a smooth, rolled surface.
Compactors achieve these results by either static weights or vibration. Care must be taken when using a vibrating compactor concerning nearby structures and pumping excess water up through the soil. The vibrations can literally causes nearby buildings to fall down. The compactor surface that touches the argumentative on technology soil can be classified as either steel drum, pneumatic rubber-tired, or sheepsfoot. Compactors can be either self-propelled or towed. These web links show equipment specifications for several common compactors. Hydraulic Excavators are extremely useful machines for both bulk excavation and application, trench excavation. Usually self-propelled on tracks, excavators operate hydraulically. The cable driven power shovels are the forerunner of the argumentative essay modern day excavator. These web links show equipment specifications for several common hydraulic excavators.
Backhoe Loaders perform a multitude of chores on an average building project: dig trenches, load material, haul material and equipment, unload trucks, provide transport, etc. Backhoe loaders are self-propelled and a dissertation weeks, rubber-tire machines. These web links show equipment specifications for argumentative essay several common backhoe loaders. So take some time and learn the basic equipment that Sitework Contractors use. Remember, the person who calls every piece of equipment on the jobsite a Bulldozer labels himself as a dope. What You should Know about essay visit, Rock Excavation? Rock excavation solutions vary greatly. The best method to remove rock in an excavation must be reassessed continually for changing conditions. However rock excavation is a fact of construction life and must be anticipated by the Construction Supervisor. Prior to a project beginning, an Owner has probably already considered the possibility of rock in the excavation area and the associated costs.
The Owner makes a decision during the argumentative design stage about the amount of geotechnical information required. The Owner has many exploratory options available. From a simple test pit to percussion drilling to core drilling the owner has increasingly more expensive options that yield increasingly better data about the site underground. For example, the essays Owner on a 100,000 SF building project may authorize twenty boring locations with split spoon soil samples taken until rock is reached and then core samples of rock. This information can be carefully studied by the Construction Supervisor and Sitework Contractor and used to help make the project schedule. Knowing the type and quality of rock (from the core samples) and location of rock (from the soils boring) is a real advantage in argumentative on technology jobsite planning. Conversely, the Owner of a 100,000 SF building may decide to proceed with no geotechnical testing whatsoever. The decision about geotechnical testing is usually made by an Owner with no input from the Construction Supervisor. All too often, though, some geotechnical testing information is available to the Construction Supervisor and possible a dissertation weeks, is not properly utilized. The section on Soils and Geology helps you understand the terms in the geotechnical report.
A knowledge of the approximate location of the on technology rock helps the Construction Supervisor to plan the sequence of steps following rock excavation. If rock is in one corner of of value a large building project, for example, the earth excavation could begin at the opposite end of the building in order to start foundation work soonest. This simple example indicates the usefulness of rock core borings (which show the type and essay, quality of rock encountered). Beginning the how to research foundation work early would be a good idea if the rock could be removed by ripping. However, if the rock is argumentative on technology extremely hard and is it a dissertation weeks, requires substantial blasting, it may be prudent to hold foundation work until the blasting is completed. The Construction Supervisor should coordinate these types of decisions and argumentative, use all the technical date available. Think about payment terms for rock on each project. Unclassified excavation stipulates that all rock or other unexpected materials (excluding hazardous materials) encountered in the sitework will be the responsibility of the descriptive place visit Contractor at no change in contract cost. An unclassified excavation is simpler from argumentative on technology a book-keeping standpoint and visit, places the argumentative responsibility for geotechnical conditions onto the Sitework Contractor. Classified excavation, on the other hand, defines rock and makes provisions for measurement and payment of any rock encountered at an agreed upon unit price. This method places the rock payment responsibility onto essays on confidence, the Owner.
The Construction Supervisor must be aware if the excavation is classified or unclassified. If classified, the Construction Supervisor must help set-up clearly understood procedures for definition and measurement of rock quantities. Rock is removed by ripping, blasting, or breaking, depending on the rock type, quality and quantity. Ripping is a mechanical splitting of rock by essay on technology, inserting a steel point into a rock crevice and applying force. The force is usually supplied by a bulldozer. Blasting involves explosives placed in drill holes and detonated. Breaking of rock by a hydraulic hammer bit mounted on an excavator is used when the rock quantity is common app essay small or blasting is on technology not feasible.
If blasting is required for rock excavation, the Construction Supervisor should be assured that the work is performed by a licensed blaster and possible to write a dissertation weeks, that the argumentative essay on technology proper permits have been obtained. The effect on existing structures and essays on confidence, nearby work should also be discussed with the blaster. It's amazing what a heavy rain can do to a construction project. Prior to the rain, the site may be dry, heavy equipment efficiently moving earth, the other trades smoothly performing their work. Essay. Within hours the project can be a sloppy, mud-hole with worker efficiency cut to about 10%. In many cases, the change comes mostly from poor planning. In most areas of the essay on importance of value in school world, the Construction Supervisor must remember a simple fact: IT WILL RAIN. Good planning can minimize the damage and disruption of essay a heavy rain to a jobsite. Essays. Often the argumentative essay excavation and grading is left to questions for 2014, the Sitework Contractor (and their Foremen is on technology responsible to supervise and direct the heavy equipment and a dissertation in 2, operators).
But remember, the on technology Construction Supervisor is responsible to complete the research entire project in an efficient, timely manner. Essay On Technology. Therefore the how to publish research papers Construction Supervisor must be continuously aware of what rain will do to the project site. It is on technology not uncommon for the Sitework Foreman to work their heavy equipment for on confidence maximum efficiency and argumentative essay on technology, hope it doesn't rain. One of the best ways to prepare for common questions for 2014 rain is to slope all grades to drain and to smooth rolled the surface prior to a rain. This work can cut down on short-term productivity, but can really help a jobsite more quickly recover from a storm. The Construction Supervisor must be far-sighted enough to insure that heavy rain does not stop work on the project longer than necessary. Argumentative Essay. Daily discussions with Sitework Foremen may be required to achieve this goal. Any time excavation is required below the existing water table on a project, the process of descriptive place dewatering must be considered.
Generally dewatering is argumentative on technology required because of a high level of ground water (underground streams and for harvard, springs) in areas with cohesionless (sandy or gravelly) soil or water yielding rock. In a truly cohesive soil, the essay water travels so slowly through the clay or silt that dewatering is not usually necessary for common app essay questions for 2014 the relatively short time of excavation. Dewatering may be required for a single footing excavation or for an entire project site. The most common dewatering methods are trench drains, deep wells and well points. A variety of pumps and piping types are used with these systems. Ground water seepage can also be decreased by cutoff methods such as sheet piling. The costs for essay on technology dewatering can be staggering, including equipment rental, labor and electricity (or fuel). High dewatering costs have paled the profit margins on far too many projects. The many variables listed below make the job of estimating dewatering costs very difficult, and very inexact. Specific soil and rock characteristics and locations.
Groundwater location, extent, direction and rate of movement (including seasonal variations). Most efficient dewatering method: trench drains, deep wells, wellpoints. Effectiveness of cutoff structures. Descriptive Essay Visit. Time period dewatering is required. Argumentative On Technology. Costs associated with dewatering system failure (mucking out and app essay for 2014, cleaning). Costs associated with over dewatering (damage to adjacent structures). In dewatering, the simplest solution is often the best. On many sites dewatering can be accomplished without pumps, using gravity, by the use of argumentative essay trench drains or siphons. This option should always be considered when analyzing the prospect of dewatering.
Obviously the option is only viable if gravity can run the water to lower ground. Trench drains can be cut with a backhoe and filled with a coarse, granular material (#4 stone for example), but care must be exercised in choosing the to write weeks water outlet type and essay on technology, location. Siphons present an economical, and often overlooked, method of dewatering. A siphon, by definition, uses atmospheric pressure to carry water from essay place one elevation, up over on technology, an obstacle, to a lower elevation. The pipes in a siphon system must be airtight and some ingenuity is often required to completely fill the common app essay questions for 2014 siphon pipe. Argumentative Essay On Technology. The siphon pipe must be full for the siphon to begin. The time required for siphon dewatering is usually longer then for pumps since the force moving the water is atmospheric pressure, not electricity or gasoline. A deep well consists of a pump, hose and a vertical well casing. The pump intake is at the bottom of the well casing (usually some crushed stone is placed down there as a filter medium).
The water is pumped up the hose, out of the well casing, and to a suitable discharge location. The effectiveness of a deep well depends mainly of the is it possible a dissertation in 2 weeks permeability of the soil. In a coarse sand, for example, a large area can be pumped to near the pump intake elevation. A less permeable soil, on the other hand, reduces the effectiveness of a deep well. Since the pump is generally at the bottom of the deep well, there are no height limitations due to vacuum lift, and deep wells can lower the groundwater over 50 feet. Wellpoints are the most complex dewatering system discussed here. The wellpoint system is on technology composed of vertical wellpoints (commonly 1-? inches diameter) connected to a header pipe at grade and a vacuum/discharge pump at grade. Common For 2014. The wellpoints operate on the principle of vacuum and have a maximum depth of about 15 feet. If deeper dewatering is required, successive sets of argumentative essay wellpoints can be installed at lower elevations.
The vertical wellpoint is actually jetted into the ground with water. Possible A Dissertation In 2 Weeks. On the bottom of the wellpoint there is essay a 2 foot long screen and valve, water jets out of essay visit this valve and creates a hole into which the wellpoint pipe can be lowered. Argumentative On Technology. This hole is often made a larger diameter (for example 10 inches) to allow for a coarse sand backfill to help filter the water. The wellpoint spacing depends on the permeability of the application university soil, but 2 feet to 6 feet centers are common. Argumentative. On average a single pump can handle up to 50 wellpoints.
The jetting portion of wellpoint work generally results in quite a bit of mud and muck at in school, grade. The Construction Supervisor should assure that provisions are made for this material to be removed. While the wellpoint system usually does an excellent job of dewatering, the pipes also cause significant congestion at grade. Since the Construction Supervisor manages the project site, he should strategically place the wellpoints and headers to minimize conflicts. Pumps are the most important, and argumentative essay on technology, the most troublesome, piece of equipment in most dewatering schemes. Most dewatering pumps are described by the following categories: a. suction pumps. b. submersible pumps Diaphragm pumps (or trash pumps)
Centrifugal pumps come in a great variety of sizes, from a 1-? inch to over 12 inch nominal discharge diameter. The most common sizes are 2 inch and 3 inch nominal discharge diameter. Centrifugal pumps can be driven by gasoline or diesel engines or be electrically powered. If gas or diesel, provisions must be made to keep fuel in the tank; these solutions range from assigning the responsibility to someone to special valves that feed fuel from how to papers 55 gallon drums. Special care must be used with liquid fuel on on technology, the jobsite. Electric pumps tend to be easier to publish research, use in many ways, but safety is an important aspect here also. It is extremely disconcerting to be standing ankle deep in on technology water, working on a pump, and realize that the to write a dissertation in 2 guy who wired it didn't know a volt from an amp. Even though it seems trivial, get an electrician to wire dewatering pumps. Using the proper breaker, wire size and essay, ground fault protection is essential.
Centrifugal suction pumps have a rigid suction line (to prevent collapse) and lift water up the level of the pump. Fifteen to twenty feet is the maximum height that water can be lifted by descriptive essay, suction. Some centrifugal suction pumps are self priming, but many must be primed prior to each use, which can be labor intensive and annoying. The centrifugal submersible pump operates in the bottom of the hole. There is no suction line, the pump must be flooded. With proper float controls these electric pumps can be quite trouble free. Diaphragm pumps are the essay on technology workhorses of construction dewatering; pumping mud, sand, small rocks, and trash (pumped material can be up to essays university, 70% of the size of the pump intake). The diaphragm pump uses a rigid suction line and is generally self-priming. The responsibility for argumentative essay on technology installing and maintaining construction dewatering pumps must be clearly assigned.
Sometimes weeks of work can be ruined if the pumps malfunction for only one day. Therefore the Construction Supervisor should know who is responsible for dewatering and be updated of the status regularly. The use of essays on confidence cutoff walls can also help control ground water on a construction project site. Argumentative On Technology. Water seepage horizontally through the soil can be a major source of water entering a project. A below grade cutoff wall can virtually stop this horizontal flow of water. Interlocking steel sheet piling, is the most common type of cutoff wall. Sheet piling functions best in course grained soils where boulder sizes are generally less then 6 inches, or where there are stratified soil layers and on importance of value, horizontal water flow greatly exceeds vertical.
It is important to on technology, drive cutoff walls well below the inside excavation elevation. What Public Domain Documents are available for Further Study? The US Army Field Manual for to write Earthmoving Operations is an excellent introduction to sitework equipment and processes. This 202 page handbook is officially called FM 5-434. Another resource, more useful in the site design area than in construction, but that may be helpful, is the US Dept of essay Defense Area Planning, Site Planning and Design Manual. It has 79 pages of information that helps one think about how to locate and layout buildings on a site. Essays On Confidence. The official name of this document is UFC 3-210-01A 16 January 2004. The Dewatering and Groundwater Control Manual produced by argumentative on technology, the US Dept of Defense provides many details describing water and sitework. The name of this document is UFC 3-220-05 16 January 2004. Tricks of the research Trade Rules of Thumb for Excavation:
Prior to any site work, get several blank site plans and mark them up with color markers showing major site and building staging issues: topsoil piles, fill piles, parking areas, material storage areas, layout locations, etc. Understand the disposal method and location for stumps, trees and argumentative, brush prior to the start. Consider future practical difficulties and legal problems that could occur. If an a dissertation weeks offsite dump site is to be used, verify that any required permits are in on technology place. Know demolition scope of work clearly before any work begins (people seem to have no sense of humor when you mistakenly tear their stuff down). When excavation begins do the following: a. Grab a handful of topsoil or whatever organic soil there is and squeeze it and get. familiar with the essays texture, color and smell. Essay. Keep looking for that soil in places. where it shouldn’t be. b. Grab a handful of soil, squeeze it and do a quick guess of on confidence a soil classification per. the instructions above.
Keep looking if the soil type changes in different areas. c. Argumentative Essay On Technology. Discuss the soil type with the excavating foreman, learn about the way the soil. compacts, passes water, etc. Get Site Contractor to of value education in school, agree to smooth roll and grade to drain at any time rain is expected.
Order Essay from Experienced Writers with Ease -
Technology Argumentative Essay - 763 Words | Bartleby
kristallnacht essay The Historical Background. Kristallnacht was a nationwide, state-sponsored pogrom (a spree of violence directed against Jews) conducted throughout Germany and argumentative essay Austria (which had been annexed by Germany in March 1938) from the evening and is it to write a dissertation night of November 9 through the following afternoon. It was presented by the Nazi regime as a spontaneous public outburst provoked by argumentative, the assassination of a minor German diplomat in Paris, Ernst vom Rath, by common app essay questions, a seventeen-year-old Polish Jew, Herschel Grynszpan. The pogrom's name comes from the German word for beveled plate glass ( Kristallglas ) and essay refers to the broken shop windows of the Jewish stores, hence Kristallnacht , or Night of the Broken Glass. The pogrom took place after five years of increasing assaults on Jewish property, citizenship rights, and their physical persons by essay on importance of value, the Nazis in order to segregate German Jews from the general public and encourage their emigration.
Grynszpan shot vom Rath, who was the only person available at the time of his impromptu visit to the German embassy in Paris where he went to protest that his parents (who were Polish and had been living in Germany but who were unable to become citizens of Germany because it was not allowed) had been rounded up by the Germans, brutally deported, and argumentative essay cruelly stranded in a no-man's land between Poland and Germany. Neither country would take responsibility for essays for harvard university, them. Grynszpan's timing for the shooting could hardly have been worse. November 8 and 9 were two of the holiest days in argumentative essay on technology the Nazi calendar. They were the twentieth anniversary of what Hitler called the infamous stab in the back by the November criminals (i.e. Jews) who had forced the Kaiser to abdicate, declare Germany a republic, and signed the debilitating armistice that ended World War I-an event that Hitler used to great advantage in his rise to power. It was also the fifteenth anniversary of the Beer Hall Putsch in Munich in 1923, which-although it had failed to bring Hitler to power-had catapulted him to national prominence.
Hitler created a glorious myth around the failed event (it was essentially a poorly planned and badly executed street brawl) which by 1938 had coalesced into an annual two-day event extolling the myth of fallen Nazi heroes dying for essay in school, a noble cause. On November 8 of each year Hitler gave a speech at the Bürgerbrukeller, where the putsch had begun in 1923 and then led a parade through the streets - complete with bloodstained flags and singing - to the site of the graves of the argumentative essay, dead where he laid memorial wreaths to place visit, the heroic fallen. It was against argumentative on technology, this background on November 8 that the news arrived in Munich about the shooting of vom Rath by a Jew. Essays! Joseph Goebbels saw it as a heaven-sent opportunity to inflame anti-Jewish feeling and ordered all German newspapers to cover it prominently on their front pages. The first promising results came that evening with reports that some synagogues had been set afire, Jewish businesses were being attacked, and Jews were being assaulted in on technology the provinces of Magdeburg-Anhalt and Hesse.
Vom Rath did not die until November 9. App Essay Questions! News of his death was brought to Hitler and Goebbels shortly before 9:00 P.M. while they were at dinner in Munich. According to argumentative essay, Goebbels himself in his diary, he and how to publish research papers Hitler spoke quietly together and they agreed to do nothing to stop any future activity along the same lines. Hitler was reported to have said “The SA should be allowed to essay on technology, have a fling.” 1 Hitler then left the is it a dissertation weeks, dinner without giving his usual speech to the Gauleiters (district leaders), probably so as to be unaccountable for any of what was to essay, come. Goebbels took his place and made the most of the opportunity. He allegedly spoke inspirationally to the “old fighters” (those who had been loyal to Hitler and essay the NSDAP since the inception of the party) and informed them that this was the argumentative on technology, time for action against the Jews. Although there is no official record of his remarks other than the personal post-war (and self-exculpatory) recollections of those present, it is essay place visit undeniable that after Goebbels’ speech initial instructions were telephoned all over the country by the Gauleiters to argumentative on technology, begin the action.
The SA (Stormtroopers) was to participate and incite the essay place, outrage of the crowds and regular policemen and firemen were ordered to argumentative essay, stand down unless German property or life was at a dissertation in 2 issue. Mass destruction broke out essay on technology, across Germany: synagogues were destroyed and burned, shop windows were broken and essay of value education stores looted, Jewish homes were invaded and essay on technology household furnishing stolen or destroyed, and Jewish people were physically assaulted, sometimes even raped and murdered, and arrested en masse . Testifying against the “spontaneous” nature of the action, the concentration camps of research Dachau, Buchenwald, and Sachsenhausen had already been prepared weeks before for on technology, the influx of of value education in school thousands of essay German Jews, especially those were influential or wealthy, who were to be arrested from previously prepared lists. 2. What Hitler Knew and When He Knew It. The timeline of events that night supports the centrality of the Nazi regime’s and Hitler’s active role in the pogrom. Hitler’s actual role in the events is shrouded in shadows, lack of primary documentation, and the contradictory self-serving statements made later by those who had been around him. Is It To Write A Dissertation In 2! However, some things can be safely asserted. After slipping out of the dinner meeting and foregoing his usual speech, Hitler returned to his hotel room, where he was most likely kept informed of the events as they progressed. Reinhard Heydrich 3 received first reports about 11:15 P.M. and on technology his close associate SS-Gruppenführer Karl Wolff 4 found out possible a dissertation, about 11:20 P.M. Essay On Technology! Friedrich Karl von Oberstein, the chief of police in Munich and essays an SS-Obergruppenführer , appears to have found out about the burning of argumentative synagogues in Munich about 11:45 P.M. . 5. It appears that Julius Schaub, an “old fighter” and apologist for Hitler after the war, informed Hitler by phone or in person before midnight about the events of the essays on confidence, evening.
Karl Wolff probably also visited Hitler’s apartment at or around 11:30 P.M. 6 At this time Heinrich Himmler 7 was also present in Hitler’s apartment. Hitler and essay on technology Himmler then officiated at the swearing-in of new SS-troops on essay on importance education the Odeonsplatz at essay midnight, after which both returned to their respective apartments. There Himmler was briefed by Heydrich on the progress of the pogrom. After this conference, Heydrich sent a telex to police forces in the rest of Germany at 1:20 A.M.
Hitler’s adjutant (aide), von Below, reports that Hitler received a phone call from Goebbels after midnight which he took in private, the essay of value education, details of which no one, including von Below, actually overheard. Goebbels’ diaries indicate that he was reveling in the violence and destruction: “In Berlin 5, then 15 synagogues burn down. Argumentative On Technology! Now the people’s anger rages. Nothing more can be done against it for the night. And I don’t want to do anything either. Should be given free rein … As I drive to the hotel, windows shatter. Bravo! The synagogues burn in all the big cities.
German property is not endangered.” 8. At 11:55 P.M. Descriptive Essay Visit! Heinrich Müller 9 sent a telex from Berlin to the SD (Security Police) and German police officials with instructions about the pogrom. In the telex, Müller warned that actions against the Jews were to begin and were not to be interrupted. Looting was to be prevented (presumably because the property would shortly thereafter be seized by the Nazis). Argumentative Essay! It further stated that up to 30,000 Jews, preferably those who were wealthy or influential, should be arrested. For Harvard University! (“Propertied Jews above all are to be chosen.”) He promised that more detailed instructions would be issued later. At 1:20 A.M. on November 10, 1938 Reinhard Heydrich transmitted by argumentative, telex an amplification of the orders given to him by Heinrich Himmler that in descriptive place visit turn expanded on the ones sent earlier by Heinrich Müller. The telex instructed the police not to prevent the destruction of Jewish property and essay on technology instructed the SD (Gestapo) not to get in the way of violent acts committed against German Jews.
However, there were some restrictions: German life and property was not to be endangered. Jewish shops and dwellings could be damaged but their contents were not to be looted (for later seizure by the Nazis) and Jewish foreign nationals were not to be assaulted or arrested. At 2:56 A.M. Rudolf Hess, the Deputy Führer to Hitler and Head of the National Socialist party, sent out a circular to local party officials. This memorandum forbade any ‘setting of fire to for harvard, Jewish shops’ as many Jews rented their premises from non-Jewish Germans and the property of the argumentative, shops was to be protected for future seizure. It is unthinkable that these men would have transmitted these instructions without authorization from Hitler.
The Aftermath of the essay on importance education in school, Pogrom. Most of the on technology, violence in Germany ended on November 10, but in papers Austria it only began on argumentative essay on technology that day and was especially fierce. In Vienna the pogrom raged fiercely: Jews were attacked (at least eight were beaten to death), 5,000 Jewish shops were wrecked, and all but one of the possible to write weeks, city’s 21 synagogues were burnt down. 10. After the pogrom, the argumentative, Nazis began a concerted effort to complete the process of ‘Aryanization’ 11 and place visit renewed their attempts to pressure German Jews to emigrate. They weakened and destroyed the Jewish self-governing bodies and replaced them with one of their own to act as a puppet organization for their emigration policies. In addition, Hermann Göring, who was in charge of the economic Four Year Plan of the Third Reich, imposed a fine of one billion Reichsmark (about $400 million) on the Jews of Germany. 12. Although most of the Jewish men who had been arrested during the pogrom were released after a couple of weeks, many hundreds more died or committed suicide in the camps. On Technology! They were generally released upon the promise of the prisoner that they and their family would leave the country for good, hence the emphasis on arresting wealthy Jews. Common! In the months following Kristallnacht more than 115,000 German Jews emigrated from the Reich.
Tens of thousands went to western European countries and Palestine, and at least 14,000 made it to Shanghai, China. In 1939, the combined German-Austrian annual immigration quota (27,370) for the United States was filled for on technology, the first time during the Nazi era. How To Papers! 13. The Nazis put the number of synagogues burned at 267 and announced that 815 shops, 29 department stores, and 171 dwellings of Jews had been burned or destroyed. The exact number of synagogues burned is unknown, but it is certainly in the hundreds. Richard Evans cites a minimum of 91 known deaths, not including those who died in the camps or who committed suicide. In addition, hundreds of other Jews were brutally beaten and even raped. In Austria alone there were at least 680 suicides during or in the wake of the essay on technology, pogrom. Historian Avraham Barkai, an expert in the economic life of Jews under the Nazis, notes that there were only is it to write a dissertation in 2, about 9,000 Jewish shops remaining in essay on technology Germany in 1938, of which Reinhard Heydrich estimated that 7,500 were destroyed or damaged.
The figures on synagogues that were burned are debated by responsible historians and essays range from 520 to 1,200 out of a total of some 1,200 to about 2,000. 14. The significance of Kristallnacht lay in the reaction of the essay on technology, Nazi regime to intense and vocal criticism from possible a dissertation in 2 abroad, which reacted to the pogrom with horror and condemnation. Thereafter the Germans chose to essay, conduct mass physical violence against Jews in secret. In a sense then, Kristallnacht was the harbinger of the ‘Final Solution.’ Anthony Read and David Fisher, Kristallnacht: The Unleashing of the university, Holocaust (New York: Peter Bedrick Books, 1989): p. 62. Head of the German Security Police including the criminal and political police.
Gruppenführer in the SS and in 1938 Himmler’s chief of staff. Richard Evans, Expert Witness Report , Section 4.3 Historical method: case studies, Subsection (c) ‘Reichskristallnacht’ November 1938: (D) Invention and manipulation of evidence: the Eberstein testimony, parts 1-7. Himmler’s visit was substantiated independently by two top Nazis and also by the British Consul to Germany in his report to the English government after the pogrom. Richard Evans, Expert Witness Report , Section 4.3 Historical method: case studies, Subsection (c) ‘ Reichskristallnacht ’ November 1938: (E) Use of unreliable evidence, suppression of reliable testimony, and invention: von Below and argumentative essay on technology Schaub, part 10. Müller was the possible a dissertation, head of Section II of the Security Police, which dealt with internal political policing (secret police). He was a direct subordinate of Reinhard Heydrich, who was in argumentative on technology turn subordinate to Heinrich Himmler.
Read and Fisher, Kristallnacht : p.109. The forced transferal of Jewish shops, businesses, assets, and homes into German hands, usually for a mere pittance of their value but sometimes for no compensation at all. Insurance was an international business and descriptive essay place visit insurance companies were worried about their loss of reputation if they did not keep their contracts to indemnify the losses. In a meeting after Kristallnacht , Göring compromised with the nervous insurance industry by essay on technology, allowing them to pay out the damages, even to Jews. To offset those losses, Göring then imposed a huge fine on the Jewish communities in order to offset the losses of the on importance in school, insurance companies. Thus, the Jews themselves ended up paying for the damages in argumentative an indirect way. The website of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: Kristallnacht , Special Exhibition.(www.ushmm.org). Richard Evans, Expert Witness Report , Part 4. Irving’s writings on Hitler, Section 4.3 Historical method: case studies, Subsection (c) ‘Reichskristallnacht ’ November 1938: Conclusion: parts 3-9. Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. Volume 2: Kristallnacht (Leni Yahil): pp.
836-840. Evans,Richard. Essays On Confidence! Expert Witness Report , Part 4. Irving’s writings on essay on technology Hitler, Section 4.3 Historical method: case studies, Subsection (c) ‘ Reichskristallnacht ’, November 1938. Read, Anthony and David Fisher. Kristallnacht: The Unleashing of the Holocaust. New York: Peter Bedrick Books, 1989. Schwab, Gerald. The Day the Holocaust Began: The Odyssey of Herschel Grynszpan New York: Praeger, 1990.
Thalmann, Rita and Emmanuel Feinermann. Crystal Night: A Gripping Documentary of the Nazi Night of Terror that was Prelude to the Holocaust. London: Thames and Hudson, 1974. Previous questions and answers on Kristallnacht are at our Questions and Answers page.